Now, shortly after the deaths - Jeremy was caught trying to sell nude pictures of his sister to a number of newspapers.
According to some more creditable newspapers, they turned him down, but when he approached some tabloids, they knew they had a better story in exposing him.
The defence team will argue this was typical of tabloids, although from memory, some more credible newspapers came to the fore and confirmed that he had made attempts to sell the photos (not sure of the nature of them, but perhaps best decribed as 'risqué' and maybe venturing into 'soft core').
Do we have supporting evidence for these events (or anything to help denounce them)?
And if he did do this, whilst not making him guilty, it is once again painting a quite dubious picture of him wouldn't you agree?