Author Topic: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored (Read 3213 times)

Roch · « **Reply #15 on:** March 09, 2011, 10:15:PM »

Freemasons

Kaldin · « **Reply #16 on:** March 09, 2011, 10:16:PM »

Quote from: Rochford Dolly Peel on March 09, 2011, 10:15:PM

Freemasons

Oh I see. Perhaps such terms could be avoided in order to prevent misunderstandings.

Roch · « **Reply #17 on:** March 09, 2011, 10:19:PM »

Quote from: Kaldin on March 09, 2011, 10:16:PM

Quote from: Rochford Dolly Peel on March 09, 2011, 10:15:PM
Freemasons

Oh I see. Perhaps such terms could be avoided in order to prevent misunderstandings.

It's all getting a bit sinister isn't it? Not that it was a bed of roses to start with

TheBrilliantMistake · « **Reply #18 on:** March 09, 2011, 10:20:PM »

Next to Men & Motors, this thread is just about the best fantasy channel in town

mike tesko · « **Reply #19 on:** March 09, 2011, 10:26:PM »

Quote from: TheBrilliantMistake on March 09, 2011, 10:20:PM

Next to Men & Motors, this thread is just about the best fantasy channel in town

-----------------------

The quality of the so called evidence that was relied upon to convict Jeremy, fits the bill, in my opinion...

chelmsey · « **Reply #20 on:** March 10, 2011, 03:23:AM »

Mike.....I am completely with you on this one.If it is indeed true that RBs DNA was found inside the moderator,then serious questions need to be asked as to how it got there?

Jeremy Bamber Forum

Author Topic: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored (Read 3213 times)

Roch

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored

Kaldin

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored

Roch

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored

TheBrilliantMistake

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored

mike tesko

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored

chelmsey

Re: Mrs Marple - fundamental clues, ignored