oh no, didn't mean to imply you had...
some have by implication pointed the finger at the family - by way of questioning how legitimate the whole silencer was/is and even when it was found, or what was done to it.
Others have just questioned the integrity of the handling of it, and if that compromised the results.
I think it's one thing to think the family seemed a bit keen, and acted in a way that doesn't seem quite befitting, and it's entirely another to take that extra step and say "so therefore this silencer they 'found'" came about dubiously so let's discount it.
As soon as the 'dubious silencer find' is questioned, it's virtually pointing the finger at the family unless it's then 'planted' by the police for the the family to find - which seems convoluted.
I have a similar issue with Mugford as I think you do with the family. If she's telling the truth (and I'm prepared to go with that) - she STILL sat on it for a month. In my mind, that means she actually considered being 'in on it' with him (after the fact) for a fair while.
I do accept an element of fear (for a couple of days), but when you're going away for weekends with him, it gets less credible... and I can't buy into the 'she couldn't quite bring herself to really believe it was him" either - if my wife called to say "she was going to murder someone, I might laugh it off" - if that person then ended up murdered the very same night - I doubt I'd be laughing it off!
1 month it took her, that's a long time when you're sleeping with a killer.
She was 21, I'll give her some slack for being a confused young woman.... but she wasn't a nun - she'd been involved in the cheque fraud, and the burglary - so she had a decent feel for the mess he was in, and she too would soon be in.
Shifty lady, very shifty