Hi NN,
I believe Nevill was battered quite a bit about the face and on the arms (defensive wounds?) as Nevill desperately fought for his life.
Even if shot (twice in the jaw, one shoulder one arm) I believe Nevill still had the ability to escape and to defend himself when caught in the Kitchen.
When people refer to Sheila having strength due to her going berserk, I believe even a wounded person has some considerable strength when defending themselves (Nevills four wounds at this stage were not life threatening in my non-medical opinion) - to me the wielding of the gun (breaking it) shows a considerable level of aggression from the attacker. Sheila was meant to have favoured her father to a degree and would not imo have inflicted such a sustained attack on Nevill – why kill him?
I believe if it was Sheila a wounded Nevill would have thrown himself at her and tackled her to the ground, but no Nevill had to run as the person they confronted was physically more powerful than Nevill
When Nevill had escaped downstairs why did Sheila not just shoot herself (with one shot in the bedroom) and just finish it – why chase him firing shots down the stairs and attack him in the kitchen clinically finishing Nevill with e the four (groups of two) clinical head shots – these murders were the work of someone who wanted them all dead – at all costs.
These murders to me represent more than a person going berserk, or being in a frenzy.
Hi Nickos
Your post does not stack up at all with the pathologist's report. You believe Nevill still had the ability to escape and defend himself when caught in the kitchen. How?
PATHOLOGIST'S REPORT:Wound 5 & 6 (Bedroom/stairs/landing)could have been life threatening had other injuries not supervened.
Caused extreme pain
Substantial loss of blood internally and externally
Wound 7 (Bedroom/stairs/landing)Left arm
TOTALLY IMPAIREDSC was a very seriously ill mentally woman and to understand why she did what she did is I think beyond the understanding of the likes of us.