I ask the following questions because I believe they require answering. I am not asking the questions for any other reason other than I, and thousands of other people/organisations, have a right to know the truth.
The family of SH and SB fell out in/around 2007. What were the reasons for the falling out?
(I don't know why her name needs to be abbreviated for this forum, if you read the articles I've posted above, her name is quoted there for all to see and I doubt very much she has objected?)
Then on/around the time of the referral back to the Court of Appeal, they are once again 'united.'
We know the family of SH appear to have never been actively involved in any campaigning? Why? Why did they always appear to take a back seat yet would make statements when there was news?
Why did the family always appear to be opposed to 'the wife?'
Why do family members of SH now appear to be aggressively doing all they can to shut down any discussion on this case? This isn't the first time either.
The brother of SH is a member of this forum. His mother made a public statement following the confession stating she believed him to be innocent. What is her stance now? Surely the brother of SH is prepared to answer this question?
Because whilst people like her allow speculation to continue, more harm is being done imo.