A lot of people feel the same and that is why SH got so much support, I still feel the evidence against him was very circumstantial but his confession seems t have trumped all of that doubt to be honest.
Whilst I believe the blame lies squarely at the feet of SH, it's a shame those around him at the time of the murder told so many lies and for so many years. Was it because they were in denial and didn't want to be linked to a murderer or did their consciences actually get the better of them over the years?
An example being, the clothes he was wearing on the night in question. The jury believed his mother to be lying at trial.
And so it seems she was.
We now know her statement was incorrect. She said he was wearing jeans and a jumper and I believe there was reference to her actually witnessing him removing his 'chunky boots.' We now know he wasn't wearing jeans or 'chunky boots,' so her mind must have been playing tricks on her?
Further, we also now know he didn't sit down to have a cup of tea with her, as she stated during trial.
http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/Hall/index.htmlHe actually arrived home wearing black mole skin trousers, a black leather jacket and black office shoes.
It must have been awful for Lynne Hall when her youngest son was arrested and charged for murder. There was a programme on ITV the other day called 'A Mother's Son'
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2404029/ telling the story of one such dilemma.
I wonder what SH was
really like growing up and what the family dynamics were
really like?
