Mike Tesko will do whatever it takes to get Jeremy released from his ordeal at the hands of the devils and demons that put him there. The judgement from the appeal (2002) demonstrates that the demons who call themselves judges of appeal, are out of touch with reality, since how can they possibly know what material, information or evidence might have effected the minds of jurors. The demonic judgement talks in riddles, says one thing one moment, then says something completely opposite the next. They choose parts of the defence submissions given at the hearing which suit thier purpose and wash over or completely ignore things which werhe and are relevant, things which would clearly have affected the outcome of the trial and verdict of the jury - these judges of appeal are not gods, they are demons, they cannot read or know how the minds of a jury, either individually, or collectively would have been effected, they don't half come up with some crap in some of the stuff they say, or have come out with, but when you have bias in your intention you cannot possible hope to be impartial - they twist everything to make it fit thier intention and purpose. I will have a great deal more to say on the contents of this judgement once I post the full (typed) presentations made to the court of appeal in 2002, We will then be in a perfect position to pull the aforementioned bias judgement to pieces once and for all, and put to bed all the nonsense contained within the bias judgement itself, and cause people to think long and hard about what really took place at the time of the shootings, at the time of Bambers arrests, at the time of the first investigation (SC/688/85) and the second investigation (SC/786/85), at the time of the trial (October 1986), and the culmative effect of all the admissible evidence that was deliberately withheld, and continues to be withheld...
