No NN I do not subscribe to what you have just stated. You have trawled and then made fit - a poor way of arguing if I may be so bold. Tracie Andrews stabbed her boyfriend repeatedly before he even had time to defend himself (in his back numerous times) or fight back so to use this as an example is not appropriate. Jane Andrews smashed her boyfriend with a cricket bat and then stabbed him with a kitchen knife while he slept, again NOT an appropriate example. The closest recent example is Jodi Arias very recently convicted of her ex-boyfriend's grisly murder. However, she also gave him little chance to fight back. NN, Nevil had the chance to fight back - entirely different scenarios tot he one you have used as 'examples. Furthermore, the multiple reviews in prison would seem a complete nonsense if he was a psychopath. Since this is deemed pretty much a lifelong condition, what would they exactly be expecting to change? I would very much like to see these 'reports' and on what basis they were conducted. The eminent psychologist DID examine Bamber - a man brought in by the defense at his original trial back in 1986. The defense team were very nonplussed by the result in which they awere very much hoping would show Bamber as perfectly normal. As a result of the examination they decided - rather shredly not to use his testimony.
NN the ability to push things out of your mind and psychopathy are two VERY different things. It seems you may have confused the two. We all have the ability to push certain unpleasant aspects of our lives out if our mind to 'put it to the back of our minds' is a human virtue, and allows us to get on with other more important things, temporarily. However, to put the brutal murder of 5 of your family to the back of your mind is a something else. A detective that questioned Jeremy bamber stated that he felt there was 'something missing' with him - of course you will scoff at this, just like most things the police have done that point towards Bamber;s guilt, but it does highlight Bamber's disturbing ability to remain totally unconcerned, and hgave rise to the suspicions that he was involved in the first place. Therefore it was highly significant.
Hi DD
I am not asking or expecting you to subscribe to my posts

I didn't realise we were arguing I thought this was a forum to debate the JB case. It would be pretty damn boring if we all agreed.
If NB had the chance to fight back why didn't he take out JB? The poor man received 3/4 gun shot wounds in the bedroom and a futher one on the stairs. Sadly by the time NB reached the kitchen his injuries were such that he was unable to put up any sort of fight.
To put the brutal murder of 5 members of your adoptive family to the back of your mind is a virtue if your're innocent and facing a criminal trial over their deaths.
A person's personality etc is dynamic. Also the potential for rehabilitation exists. If it didn't there would be no such thing as parole for violent offenders and the like, hence one of the reasons for continual assessment.
DD there's no evidence JB was or is a psychopath. I know you would like it to be otherwise but I am afraid those that are qualified to make such a judgement are of the opinion he is not. This is based on in-depth interviews and tests. If you choose to believe otherwise fine
Are you able to identify the 'eminent' psychologist and/or provide any supporting evidence of his/her findings?
I understand one of the detectives that questioned JB stated "something was missing" but I prefer to base my decisions on something a little more concrete. It's of course up to you what you base your decisions on

Are you able to add anything to the post I put up yesterday as follows? I am interested in your views given that you believe JB to be a psychopath since this would mean that 3/4 members of the Bamber family were either mentally ill or personality disordered.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4287.msg177815.html#msg177815