By the way Steve the reference to the "yapping" dog was because Daniel said in his senario that Jeremy "crept" into the twins bedroom. I mentioned the yapping dog Crispy to demonstrate that as soon as someone tried to enter the house the dog would have started yapping, therefore putting the logic of his senario in peril. Not only do we have yappy old Crispy indoors, but also the bigger guard dog in the shed outside. So quite frankly I doubt that senarion.
By the way the reason that Bamber supporters do not have a fixed senario in their minds is not because they cannot think of one. It is because unlike many of those who think Jeremy to be guilty they are slow to jump to any conclusions as they believe there are far too anomalies with the case. Therefore they are acting in a wise way so that all the evidence can be taken into consideration.
Personally I can see arguments for both sides. But also believe that there is so much evidence missing in the puzzle that I cannot consider a senario and to be frank I cannot see how many of the guilty camp can do so. But of course they can't really. They just do it to make us think that they are looking at things logically. But in reality they are only guessing at the senario.
