Author Topic: Why did Victor Temple represent me in 1994, and represent CPS in Bamber appeal..  (Read 7297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
In my opinion, Temple should not have taken the post of opposing Bambers 2002 appeal, because he sounded me out about things Bamber and me knew were wrong with the police case built up to help convict Jeremy - I was under the impression that Temple was prepared to try and help Bamber, but all along Temple threw me to the wolves in 1994, and set about helping to keep Bamber in jail for the rest of his life in 2002...

I was betrayed by Temple, QC, So was Jeremy...





I will never forget the lessons I learned at the hands of the devils and demons who work in the name of State agencies, I know what I know, I do not need anyone to speak for me, what I say comes from the heart...

"at sunt daemonia Civitatis institutionum"
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
I will never forget the lessons I learned at the hands of the devils and demons who work in the name of State agencies, I know what I know, I do not need anyone to speak for me, what I say comes from the heart...

"at sunt daemonia Civitatis institutionum"

So I ask again. Did you know bamber in 1988 when you were represented by Temple?

Do you consider both your convictions to be miscarriages of justice?

How many times have you been convicted when it wasn't a miscarriage of justice?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Three different silencers at court during the trial, but defence and jury only knew about one of them, the one supposedly bearing an exhibit reference of SBJ/1 - it later transpires that silencers involved in the investigations had three separate exhibit references, SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1. You do not have to be a brain surgeon to be able to work it out that the other two silencers brought covertly to the court where the trial was taking place, were / are the other two silencers in the equation, SBJ/1 and DB/1...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
In my opinion, Temple should not have taken the post of opposing Bambers 2002 appeal, because he sounded me out about things Bamber and me knew were wrong with the police case built up to help convict Jeremy - I was under the impression that Temple was prepared to try and help Bamber, but all along Temple threw me to the wolves in 1994, and set about helping to keep Bamber in jail for the rest of his life in 2002...

I was betrayed by Temple, QC, So was Jeremy...



"at sunt daemonia Civitatis institutionum"
Hi Mike
I'm a tad confused and would welcome your clarification
Did Temple represent you in 1988?
Did Temple represent you in 1994?
In which year did you first meet Jeremy?
In what way, did Temple throw you to the wolves in 1994?
When did Temple sound you out?
What did you inform Temple on the occasion that he sounded you out?
jim

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Hi Mike
I'm a tad confused and would welcome your clarification
Did Temple represent you in 1988?
Did Temple represent you in 1994?
In which year did you first meet Jeremy?
In what way, did Temple throw you to the wolves in 1994?
When did Temple sound you out?
What did you inform Temple on the occasion that he sounded you out?
jim




Temple represented me in connection with the burglary of the retired judges house in Derbyshire, an offence committed by Gordon Stanton (Cardinal) on 9th July 1991, for which I was remanded into custody for on the following day (10th July1991), and stood trial for in late 1994 - He represented me at this trial, whilst Michael Mansfield, QC, represented me at my appeal...

We had conferences pretrial and it was during these meetings that Bamber cropped up,  since it was potentially part of my defence that police had singled me out, because police had been arrested and charged with offences of Perjury, forgery, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in one of my earlier cases,  and because I had been operating before my latest arrest as Jeremy Bambers McKensie man, trying to promote the injustices of his case...
« Last Edit: May 09, 2013, 05:51:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
You'd disturbed a hornets nest you see,Mike.

jim ignatowski

  • Guest



Temple represented me in connection with the burglary of the retired judges house in Derbyshire, an offence committed by Gordon Stanton (Cardinal) on 9th July 1991, for which I was remanded into custody for on the following day (10th July1991), and stood trial for in late 1994 - He represented me at this trial, whilst Michael Mansfield, QC, represented me at my appeal...

We had conferences pretrial and it was during these meetings that Bamber cropped up,  since it was potentially part of my defence that police had singled me out, because police had been arrested and charged with offences of Perjury, forgery, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in one of my earlier cases,  and because I had been operating before my latest arrest as Jeremy Bambers McKensie man, trying to promote the injustices of his case...
Hi Mike
But this thread relates to Temple representing you in 1988 (that's what it refers to above my last post). Is that correct and when did you first meet Jeremy?
Jim