0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hello Pattiwhere has thou been my Yorkshire lassie hope you've not been on ale
260 pages of Shorthand (typed) notes, from the 2002 Appeal...
The above document is new to me but looks worthy of discussion. I've read it quickly and it seems the defence employed a couple of private detectives to look into Sheila's background. They concluded more museli than marijuana.
Well at least that's some light relief for a change.
This doc is heavy going but I'm wading through. Up to page 15 where it seems to state a silencer was found in the bedroom?
No, its mentioned in a hypothetical sense.
I call " skimming " doing a Mugford as that's what she used to say when being questioned, pretending that she'd read the bit about the £25,000, particularly the date in which it was signed for.
Thread as per title. Stop dumbing everything down to your level which is simply slagging off the prosecution witnesses.
It wouldn't be the first time that someone's been paid to stand as prosecution witness to give evidence. A truly despicable practice that doesn't deserve a place in law.It does make me wonder about others who could have received a back-hander, B.Wilson and B.Collins for instance who in their original EP interviews gave shining examples of the kind of person JB was.Some time before the murders Sheila had told BW " ALL PEOPLE ARE BAD AND SHOULD BE KILLED " DS Jones had never obtained a witness statement about what Sheila had said and neither BW or AE ever mentioned this in any interview.
And how do your two posts above relate to the thread title?