Author Topic: Vanishing bloodstained knickers key to solving movement of body...  (Read 5962 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9

I suggest you take a look on the red forum,vidvic,,as there's a much brighter,clearer photograph on there.!

But we're not on the red forum lookout.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
But we're not on the red forum lookout.


All the more reason why you should look for yourself and see that it's not just this forum which displays tasteless photographs. At least here,you can see what goes on,,but behind your back,it's different.? Even if it's the same pic.? That's called being selective in who you choose to have a go at.
 

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9

All the more reason why you should look for yourself and see that it's not just this forum which displays tasteless photographs. At least here,you can see what goes on,,but behind your back,it's different.? Even if it's the same pic.? That's called being selective in who you choose to have a go at.

And where do you think they get their pics from?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
And where do you think they get their pics from?


I don't know.Why not ask them. Wherever the pics came from,,they didn't appear to be overly concerned about showing them on the forum.?

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9

All the more reason why you should look for yourself and see that it's not just this forum which displays tasteless photographs. At least here,you can see what goes on,,but behind your back,it's different.? Even if it's the same pic.? That's called being selective in who you choose to have a go at.

Glad you agree they're tasteless.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9

I don't know.Why not ask them. Wherever the pics came from,,they didn't appear to be overly concerned about showing them on the forum.?

I thought you said it was the press?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Caroline R

  • Guest
Glad you agree they're tasteless.

I have made my feelings re: the pictures perfectly clear, but it's not just up to me whether or not we continue to keep posting them in threads. They are in the archives so I see no reason to have to keep re posting them. I have asked the question and so far there is agreement that only a link to the picture should be posted - however, not everyone has responded to the question - yet.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hello Caroline  posters objecting to these photo's should do what I do and not look at them.  I have not looked at one single photo I do not have the need I can understand the point Mike is making without having to see what I suspect are very distressing images.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Right,,,now that we've got a few things straight,,,let's not have any more derogatory remarks made,,,including that said of Jeremy.It works both ways.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
lookout  I agree with you on that one.  Jeremy Bamber is serving life in prison that is enough I think.

Lugg

  • Guest
Right,,,now that we've got a few things straight,,,let's not have any more derogatory remarks made,,,including that said of Jeremy.It works both ways.
Well in actual fact lookout I think it was JB himself who objected to the pictures being posted on the internet?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Though gratuitous use of these pictures should be avoided there is a case for displaying them to buttress one's argument and to foster debate,such as the bloodied socks remaining on the floor of the master bedroom whilst the knickers were left to soak in a bucket in the kitchen.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
steve it is quite obvious that Sheila herself had an "accident" and put her own underwear to soak in cold water probably as this loosens the stains and prevents permanant staining.  We on the forum discussed the socks and suspect they belonged to Ralph and he left them on the floor before retiring and they became blood stained from the splatter nothing sinister about this at all.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
steve it is quite obvious that Sheila herself had an "accident" and put her own underwear to soak in cold water probably as this loosens the stains and prevents permanant staining.  We on the forum discussed the socks and suspect they belonged to Ralph and he left them on the floor before retiring and they became blood stained from the splatter nothing sinister about this at all.
That's quite possible susan but it may well have been June who for practical reasons helped out Sheila and cancelled her bible class because of it. I know this has been discussed before but isn't this often the case with fora such as this. I'm not sure Ralph would have just left his socks on the floor knowing June was in bed,a bed which does seem to dominate what is quite a small room considering the exterior of the Georgian building.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
That's quite possible susan but it may well have been June who for practical reasons helped out Sheila and cancelled her bible class because of it. I know this has been discussed before but isn't this often the case with fora such as this. I'm not sure Ralph would have just left his socks on the floor knowing June was in bed,a bed which does seem to dominate what is quite a small room considering the exterior of the Georgian building.


It would be helpful to know what preceded Nevill going to bed and where he deposited the other clothes he'd removed. If his socks were the last thing to be removed, he may not have bothered to put them with the rest of tomorrows washing. I really can't see why he wouldn't have left them on the floor just because June was in bed. Incidentally, do we know it was a prayer meeting that she cancelled or just a church meeting per se that she sent apologies for missing?