Sheila's right hand resting on sooty magazine clue...

[Bridget]

Bridget,,I'm sorry,,but it's not good enough to state that " there was a remote possibility " of anything.
I'm a black and white person,,always have been,,so it either was,or it wasn't,,nothing in-between.

Not your fault,,not my fault,,but this is about how the case was dealt with,and to my mind,,it was a ruddy shambles from start to finish.

There was no DNA testing at the time of the trial so they presented the best evidence they had at the time. It was up to the jury whether or not to accept it.

[lookout]

There was no DNA testing at the time of the trial so they presented the best evidence they had at the time. It was up to the jury whether or not to accept it.

Well at some point in time " the best " will prove that it should never have been submitted.

[Bridget]

In your opinion.

[lookout]

My opinion is a pretty strong one too.

[Bridget]

But nevertheless as worthless as mine in the scheme of things.

[lookout]

But nevertheless as worthless as mine in the scheme of things.

I suppose so for the time being,anyway.

[mike tesko]

There was no DNA testing at the time of the trial so they presented the best evidence they had at the time. It was up to the jury whether or not to accept it.

Best evidence being the introduction of the dodgy silencer, and the dodgy photographs taken by PC Bird, after police officers restaged Sheila's body on the bedroom floor - easy to fool the jury and everybody else wasn't it...

[lookout]

A case of what the eye doesn't see,eh,Mike.? Are all cases carried out this way.?

[Steve_uk]

No don't do that. I rather like it for the short snappy posts. I took one to read the Eaton's had a baby until the sentence became clear.

[Bridget]

No don't do that. I rather like it for the short snappy posts. I took one to read the Eaton's had a baby until the sentence became clear.

Lol

It's ok if the response is only a few words but he sticks whole paragraphs in it and it takes ages to scroll through. I have a low boredom threshold.

[Alias]

Lol

It's ok if the response is only a few words but he sticks whole paragraphs in it and it takes ages to scroll through. I have a low boredom threshold.

So do I. I was just thinking, is there no way of speeding the damned thing up!

[packagebuilder]

What mike is saying, toxicology results.

they test the blood for chemicals like drugs or poisons

and urine to for the same..

If this "flake blood" inside the silencer was Shelia's then it should come back positive for cannabis? if tested for drugs.

We know Shelia's blood test of toxicology came back positive for cannabis!! if the blood in the silencer came back negative then its not her blood and the case falls! we all know rabbits don't smoke cannabis.

[Bridget]

What mike is saying, toxicology results.

they test the blood for chemicals like drugs or poisons

and urine to for the same..

If this "flake blood" inside the silencer was Shelia's then it should come back positive for cannabis? if tested for drugs.

We know Shelia's blood test of toxicology came back positive for cannabis!! if the blood in the silencer came back negative then its not her blood and the case falls! we all know rabbits don't smoke cannabis.

They didn't test the flake for cannabis.

[Lugg]

What mike is saying, toxicology results.

they test the blood for chemicals like drugs or poisons

and urine to for the same..

If this "flake blood" inside the silencer was Shelia's then it should come back positive for cannabis? if tested for drugs.

We know Shelia's blood test of toxicology came back positive for cannabis!! if the blood in the silencer came back negative then its not her blood and the case falls! we all know rabbits don't smoke cannabis.

Good point PB. I have the reasoning powers of a rabbit sometimes.

[Lugg]

They didn't test the flake for cannabis.

Interesting. Another fail on their part then? Especially if they were trying to prove that the silencer was used that night.