Statement of Ann Eaton 8th - 13th September 1985

[Steve_uk]

On the day Jeremy and AE went to the caravan show,Jeremy said to Ann "I shouldn't really be telling you this,but...." He goes on to talk about his plans for Vaulty. I have read many times,that Jeremy was supposed to have said "This time next year Ann,this will all be ours"(regarding caravan park) and Ann responds by telling him that her mother isn't about to retire yet. It doesn't say that in the statement.Where did it come from?

It's on page 6 of her statement here:http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=497.0

[Bridget]

That's not what he is talking about - Yesterday you said that the innocent side have a dilemma - if they think that Julie is an accessory, then they must believe JB guilty. By the same token, if you think JB is guilty, Julie must be an accessory!! They were your words and as you think he is indeed guilty - it's YOUR dilemma!

Must she though?? I'm not sure we actually have an offence of accessory after the fact anymore in this country and the nearest I can find (assisting an offender) requires a positive act rather than just a failure to say anything, as does perverting the course of justice. There is also an offence of concealing an offence, but that requires payment of some sort. I suppose the money he gave her for a holiday could amount to that, but it would be difficult to prove that that was the purpose. Was there anything in her early statements that was identified at trial or appeal as a deliberate lie?

Maybe NGB could help us out here, it'd be interesting to find out what the actual position would be.

[lookout]

Or, by association,as opposed to an accessory.?

[Alias]

In JMs statement she says that he said "everything is going well, not to worry, there is something wrong at the farm".

That sentence does not make sense. Did she ask: "How are you?" or something along those lines, and he replied, "Everything is going well (with me), not to worry, BUT there is something wrong at the farm."
Otherwise it is nonsense.

Oh, and we are in Julie-praise mode again. 

[Jane]

That sentence does not make sense. Did she ask: "How are you?" or something along those lines, and he replied, "Everything is going well (with me), not to worry, BUT there is something wrong at the farm."
Otherwise it is nonsense.

Oh, and we are in Julie-praise mode again. 

Alias Hi. You're right. Thosen words don't ring true. If I had to drag myself out of bed in the middle of the night to hear the person on the other end say that everything was going well, I think the VERY least I would ask was what the hell they were talking about.

Oh, and my opinion of Julie doesn't extend to praise mode :D :D :D

[Alias]

Alias Hi. You're right. Thosen words don't ring true. If I had to drag myself out of bed in the middle of the night to hear the person on the other end say that everything was going well, I think the VERY least I would ask was what the hell they were talking about.

Oh, and my opinion of Julie doesn't extend to praise mode :D :D :D

I have a remidy against the Julie-Pulie-praise. Here it is!

[lookout]

Who was it that " taught her sex as never before ".? Not Jeremy,,,surely.!

[Jane]

I have a remidy against the Julie-Pulie-praise. Here it is!

And there we have it. Unsophisticated Julie, product of an all girls grammer school, a frightened young girl of 20. I wouldn't mind betting she had tricks up her sleeve that Jeremy had only fantasized about before he knew her.

[Alias]

Who was it that " taught her sex as never before ".? Not Jeremy,,,surely.!

Sexy posing and sex-talk for money on the back of horrendous murders, including little kids. Talk about dragging the poor deceased through the mud, what a way to treat their memory! It is plainly despicable, and I have a hard time stomacking the praise showered on her by some people. She was a sick, sick girl.

[maggie]

Sexy posing and sex-talk for money on the back of horrendous murders, including little kids. Talk about dragging the poor deceased through the mud, what a way to treat their memory! It is plainly despicable, and I have a hard time stomacking the praise showered on her by some people. She was a sick, sick girl.

Hi Alias, I agree with you, that photograph and article is a total disgrace and how on earth could she agree to any of it? ....I suppose she 'did it for the money'.....heard that phrase before somewhere!!

[susan]

Maggie she must be a woman without a soul.  That should not have been a happy day for her at all and proved she did not give a fig for Jeremy Bamber

[Steve_uk]

That's not what he is talking about - Yesterday you said that the innocent side have a dilemma - if they think that Julie is an accessory, then they must believe JB guilty. By the same token, if you think JB is guilty, Julie must be an accessory!! They were your words and as you think he is indeed guilty - it's YOUR dilemma!

That doesn't follow at all. Julie might be an accessory if she knowlingly allowed Jeremy to kill his family without lifting a finger to stop it,in which case Jeremy would have been foolish to telephone Julie in the middle of the night with witnesses to hand on Julie's side. The telephone calls are a continuum in any case from the earlier call in the evening in which Jeremy said "tonight's the night..it's now or never",to which Julie prayed that it was "never". You have no evidence that Julie actively encouraged Jeremy to kill his parents,sister and nephews,no evidence that she gave him an alibi for the murders and no evidence that she knew he himself was the perpetrator,which is why he told her that Matthew McDonald had been the hitman.

[Jane]

Sexy posing and sex-talk for money on the back of horrendous murders, including little kids. Talk about dragging the poor deceased through the mud, what a way to treat their memory! It is plainly despicable, and I have a hard time stomacking the praise showered on her by some people. She was a sick, sick girl.

Yet it seem, she is worshipped.

[killingeve]

And there we have it. Unsophisticated Julie, product of an all girls grammer school, a frightened young girl of 20. I wouldn't mind betting she had tricks up her sleeve that Jeremy had only fantasized about before he knew her.

There appear to be distinct differences between Suzette Ford, Julie Mugford and Anji Greaves?  Suzette and Anji were imo far more attractive looking than Julie.  Both were slim and blonde whereas Julie looks a bit chubby and is dark.  They also appear more mature and emotionally stable.  Well in fact they were both older than JB so this might account for the maturity plus Suzette had 2/3 children by her ex-husband.  I'm not sure what Suzette did for a living?  Anji was a beautician.  JM may have been the odd one out in that she was uni educated?  Interestingly the mothers of JM and Anji both appear to have liked JB. 

[Steve_uk]

I have a remidy against the Julie-Pulie-praise. Here it is!

The first time I saw this picture last Saturday I was as shocked as anybody:the pictures are in thoroughly bad taste and Julie should not have proceeded with them. However the striking impact of the picture(and it's true that a picture can paint a thousand words)was somewhat mitigated by the unbelievably vulgar comments posted by several female members alongside on that occasion. I also think there would have been a similar photograph emanating from Anji Greaves had Jeremy been released,along with loose tongue pub talk emanating from Jeremy some weeks down the line which would have made a mockery of the whole not guilty verdict.