Tesko files - Lets get to bottom of when exhibits, SBJ/1, 2, 3 and 4, seized...

[mike tesko]

If seized by DS Jones at scene on 7th August 1985 - case over, convvictions have to be quashed...

[mike tesko]

If DS Jones seized exhibits, SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, before 10th August 1985, it establishes that relatives did not recover silencer, SBJ/1 on 10th August, it establishes that Peter Eaton did not hand DS Jones silencer SBJ/1 on 12th August 1985, it establishes that silencers, DRB/1 and DB/1, were not the same silencers, as SBJ/1...

It establishes, that the explanation that  was given for changing the silencers exhibit reference to the silencer found by David Boutflour on 10th August 1985, from SBJ/1, to DB/1, and then changed again to DRB/1, is nothing but a sham - because exhibit SBJ/1, the silencer, was already in existence brfore David Boutflour supposedly found it (SBJ/1) in the gun cupboard on 10th August 1985. It also means that various experts at the lab', must also be conspirators, because these three different silencers (SBJ/1, DB/1, DRB/1), could not possibly be the same silencer, for all the reasons given...

[mike tesko]

Arrest former DS "Stan" Jones, ask him under caution and in peril of being prosecuted for perverting the course of justice, ask him when exactly he found these four exhibits, when he took possession of them, or when he seized the four exhibits from the scene at whf...

That would be a good starting point...

[mike tesko]

Arrest former DS "Stan" Jones, ask him under caution and in peril of being prosecuted for perverting the course of justice, ask him when exactly he found these four exhibits, when he took possession of them, or when he seized the four exhibits from the scene at whf...

That would be a good starting point...

Ask him why therre is no reference in his dodgy pocketbook entries relating to the seizure of these / those dodgt four exhibits from the scene on 7th August 1985, SBJ/1, SBJ/2, SBJ,3 and SBJ/4...

[Roch]

If DS Jones seized exhibits, SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, before 10th August 1985, it establishes that relatives did not recover silencer, SBJ/1 on 10th August, it establishes that Peter Eaton did not hand DS Jones silencer SBJ/1 on 12th August 1985, it establishes that silencers, DRB/1 and DB/1, were not the same silencers, as SBJ/1...

It establishes, that the explanation that  was given for changing the silencers exhibit reference to the silencer found by David Boutflour on 10th August 1985, from SBJ/1, to DB/1, and then changed again to DRB/1, is nothing but a sham - because exhibit SBJ/1, the silencer, was already in existence brfore David Boutflour supposedly found it (SBJ/1) in the gun cupboard on 10th August 1985. It also means that various experts at the lab', must also be conspirators, because these three different silencers (SBJ/1, DB/1, DRB/1), could not possibly be the same silencer, for all the reasons given...

In theory I'd say that is right.  What have you got, to show that these other exhibits existed and what they consisted of?

[mike tesko]

In theory I'd say that is right.  What have you got, to show that these other exhibits existed and what they consisted of?

To start off with, I have copies of MPR entries which relate to three of these four exhibits, SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, all found or seized at the scene, on the same day that Jeremy Bamber made his first witness statement, dated, 7th August 1985 - these entries relate to a MPR entry made up in connection with the first investigation (SC/688/85) when police were treating the shootings as four murders and a suicide, entries which are missing once the police investigation (SC/786/85) changed course, and became a five murders investigation...

For some reason, exhibits SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, became problematic to the police case of trying to successfully prosecute Jeremy for these murders, so they got rid of any reference to them in the new investigation (SC/786/85)...

[Roch]

To start off with, I have copies of MPR entries which relate to three of these four exhibits, SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, all found or seized at the scene, on the same day that Jeremy Bamber made his first witness statement, dated, 7th August 1985 - these entries relate to a MPR entry made up in connection with the first investigation (SC/688/85) when police were treating the shootings as four murders and a suicide, entries which are missing once the police investigation (SC/786/85) changed course, and became a five murders investigation...

For some reason, exhibits SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, became problematic to the police case of trying to successfully prosecute Jeremy for these murders, so they got rid of any reference to them in the new investigation (SC/786/85)...

Am I right in thinking that you have posted up this MPR schedule before?

[mike tesko]

Am I right in thinking that you have posted up this MPR schedule before?

Yes...

[Roch]

Yes...

I've tried to find it on here before but couldn't.  Is it the one where somebody has covered the boxes and then copied it, so that there are blank boxes?

[mike tesko]

I've tried to find it on here before but couldn't.  Is it the one where sombody has covered the boxes and then copied it, so that there are blank boxes?

No, I will try to locate it now, before I retire to bed, and post it again...

[mike tesko]

No, I will try to locate it now, before I retire to bed, and post it again...

Here:-

[mike tesko]

Items SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, found by DS Jones...

[mike tesko]

Exhibit SBJ/3 Photo taken of downstairs toilet by DS Jones, is understood to show Anthony Pargeters .22 bolt action rifle, and silencer, as being present. The silencer (SBJ/1) seized by DS Jones is believed to be the one owned by Anthony Pargeter...