Batman on the case...

[mike tesko]

"Riddle me this, riddle me that, how many silencers fell into the hat, a silencer for you, a silencer for me, another silencer for luck, which brings a total of three"...

[mike tesko]

"I think I have the answer, Robin, I think I have the answer, bat logic not only dictates that there were four similar silencers, not three, but also that three of the four silencers were decoys, fakes, introduced and eradicated for the purpose of presenting the silencer evidence as a solitary item, so disguised to help bolster the prosecutions case"...

[mike tesko]

"Who framed who, who framed me, who framed poor Jeremy? Am I the framer, am I the blamer, Does it suit me, being framed, will the culprits ever be named"...

[mike tesko]

"Robin, Robin, Robin, there is something extremely dodgy, about the silencer evidence, somebody has been tampering with exhibits in this case, it is just a case of identifying who did what, where , when and why"...

[mike tesko]

"Who, Batman"...

[mike tesko]

"Who, what Robin"...

[mike tesko]

"Who, what, where"...

[mike tesko]

"Who, what, where and when, Robin, I am starting to get very angry"...

[mike tesko]

"Why, Batman, why"...

[mike tesko]

"You wouldn't like me, when I get angry, Robin"...

[mike tesko]

"This deception must be rectified and exposed - do you see the significance in the case file Robin, where they start asking one of the experts in the case to alter the exihibit reference to the silencer to DB/1, this handwritten note sent by the senior SOC officer, Ron Cook to the ballistic expert at the lab', Malcolm Fletcher, on 17th October 1985"...

[mike tesko]

"And yet, there exists a General Examination Record purporting to relate to the submission of a silencer to the lab' on 13th August 1985, bearing that very same exhibit reference, (DB/1) which did not come into existence until, as we have seen, the 17th October 1985, Robin, two months later"...

[mike tesko]

"Holy deception, Batman, what fiendish tactics are a foot, here"...

[mike tesko]

"Why would a senior detective on the case, send that memo to the ballistic expert on the case, Robin, on 17th October 1985, asking him to amend the silencers exhibit reference to DB/1, if that silencer already had that exhibit reference (DB/1) from 13th August 1985, since my young companion, it does not make sense if there was only ever just the one silencer"...

[mike tesko]

"I want you to think about this, Robin - How come that by 20th September 1985, exhibits bearing the identifying marks of DRB/2 and DRB/3, were being sent along to the lab', whilst a silencer  bearing two different exhibit references, namely, SBJ/1, and DB/1, had both been submitted to the lab' to be examined, on 13th and 30th August 1985...

Then, on 17th October 1985, two months after that, Senior SOC officer, Cook, sends a memo to the lab' requesting that the silencer exhibit reference be amended to DB/1...

Why would you request the ballistic expert at the lab' on 17th October 1985, to amend the silencer exhibit reference, from DB/1 to DB/1?

Here, Robin, take at look at this"...