Author Topic: dr palmer.  (Read 3416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17205
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
dr palmer.
« on: August 30, 2012, 03:57:PM »
as i can see this guy had no credible cliam to be inocent.

i still think its an interesting case though.

http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/exhibit/palmer/default.htm

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2012, 08:47:PM »
as i can see this guy had no credible cliam to be inocent.

i still think its an interesting case though.

http://www.staffspasttrack.org.uk/exhibit/palmer/default.htm

Very interesting nugnug, It sound familiar with the John Bodkin Adams case. No real evidence, but based on gossip....

I have popped that into my favourites to read about it more in depth....... :) :) :) :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17205
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2012, 08:50:PM »
im inclined to think he was guilty the evidence was purely circumstancel though i agree.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2012, 09:00:PM »
im inclined to think he was guilty the evidence was purely circumstancel though i agree.

Hi Nugnug....That is so weird, how is it possible that you and I have read that document, yet share opposite opinions....Can I ask why you think he is guilty? I will have to look at all the details before I come to a decision....but from reading that, I am of an opinion that all is not as it appears to be....I wonder how many innocent people have hung?  :) :) :) :) :)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17205
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2012, 09:13:PM »
well to me there just seem to be to many coincidences.

the evidence was circumstantial .but that forensic hardly existed in those days.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2012, 09:14:PM by nugnug »

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2012, 09:54:PM »
well to me there just seem to be to many coincidences.

the evidence was circumstantial .but that forensic hardly existed in those days.

Oh nugnug, there aren't enough hours in the day for me, I would love to stay up and read it all  :-[
But, I am very tired and must go to bed, up at 5:45 and I am thinking of having the afternoon off... ;D ;D ;D ;D Speak tomorrow.

Offline boheme

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
Re: dr palmer.
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2012, 01:36:PM »
Its strange that all the victims were poisoned though - none stabbed or strangled etc... I am glad I was not one of his relations !