Author Topic: Re: Adoption Debate  (Read 22921 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #45 on: March 04, 2013, 12:06:AM »
Hi Maggie

I responded to this on Friday but it appears to have got lost somewhere  :-\

I did not say that June adopted reluctantly I said ambivalently:

Psychology . the coexistence within an individual of positive and negative feelings toward the same person, object, or action, simultaneously drawing him or her in opposite directions.

I struggle to comprehend how a woman like June with strong religious beliefs and firm views on sexual morality reconciled her feelings with regard to adopting two illegitimate children.

As we know June took her religious beliefs seriously.  The CoA document states the following:

14.   June Bamber was also 61 years old. Religion had always played a strong part in her life. In her latter years her interest in this regard had to an extent come to dominate her thinking, to a point that might have been thought to be obsessive. In 1982, she received treatment at a psychiatric hospital in Northampton

(Note no ref to June's mental illness in 1959  :o

Given the above and my post as follows:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3955.msg164365.html#msg164365

and the following link referring to adoptive parents and religion I'm sure you will understand my thinking  ;)

http://www.originsnsw.com/mentalhealth/id5.html

The above link quotes Dr Alexina Mcwhinnie from Dundee university as follows:

"Mc Whinnie also refers to her study about the conditions of religious affiliation for prospective adopters. Her study again shows that other factors are important here, and it should not be assumed that because the adopters are members of a church they would make sympathetic adopters. In fact it would seem important to assess particularly carefully the attitudes of those who hold very rigid religious beliefs since these, if unduly puritanical, might lead them to finding difficulty in accepting illegitimacy and the child born to unmarried parents"

Lol I have no idea how my adoptive parents manged to 'acquire' me given that my Dad is and always has been an ardent atheist and my adoptive mother not far behind.  I'm sure they must have lied to the adoption agency  ;D ;D ;D.  I remember my Dad, brother and me loved those Dave Allen sketches about religion.  Thank you Daddy for setting me on the right path  :-*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxo81Ok9Urk
I think that you only think your dad started you on the right path only because you yourself agree with it? But you seem to unfairly judge those Christian parents who adopt children under similar circumstances? No doubt if those children who had been brought up in a Christian environment and had become Christians themselves you would say that they had been brainwashed?
Probably news to you. But my wife was an adoptee just after the war and her mother was an unmarried mother who was taken in by a Christian institution as she was rejected by her own parents.
My wife's parents were also Christians and they adopted her as a little girl and was also brought up in a Christian environment. She had a very normal life with her adoptive parents and as far as I know was very happy. So yes Christians also can have mercy and love towards unmarried mothers and their children. And also it is not right to say that only those with no religion can be acceptable parents.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #46 on: March 04, 2013, 12:19:AM »



I personally think that Sheilas' " mental " problems stemmed from puberty. Then as her hormones developed and she became pregnant at 17 ( which was aborted ) the girl will have suffered post-natally,,excerbated by two miscarriages/terminations which added to her hormonal imbalance then giving birth to the twins and having to spend time in hospital prior to the births,,left untreated,,does lead to severe mental illness,in time,,,PND.. The more that Sheila ignored the signs of being unwell,,the more a "defence mechanism "would automatically kick,, in which is a chemical given off by the thyroid gland involved in the " fight or flight " situation and if left,,can lead to serious problems.

You would have to read up on Endocrinology to understand how the balance of Sheilas' hormones would have been tipped.

Lol Lookout you've just stated it was a faulty gene:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3974.msg163906.html#msg163906

Please see my post as follows about Sheila's unplanned pregnancies:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3955.msg164365.html#msg164365

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #47 on: March 04, 2013, 12:30:AM »
I think that you only think your dad started you on the right path only because you yourself agree with it? But you seem to unfairly judge those Christian parents who adopt children under similar circumstances? No doubt if those children who had been brought up in a Christian environment and had become Christians themselves you would say that they had been brainwashed?
Probably news to you. But my wife was an adoptee just after the war and her mother was an unmarried mother who was taken in by a Christian institution as she was rejected by her own parents.
My wife's parents were also Christians and they adopted her as a little girl and was also brought up in a Christian environment. She had a very normal life with her adoptive parents and as far as I know was very happy. So yes Christians also can have mercy and love towards unmarried mothers and their children. And also it is not right to say that only those with no religion can be acceptable parents.

Yes I agree Lugg.  My sister-in-law is a regular church goer.  Two of my best female friends are religious: one a Christian the other a Catholic.  But they're not fanatical imo June was as stated in the CoA doc and Dr Ferguson's witness statements.

Most muslims are peace loving but some want to blow up anything that doesn't fit their warped view of Islam.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #48 on: March 04, 2013, 10:03:AM »
Lol Lookout you've just stated it was a faulty gene:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3974.msg163906.html#msg163906

Please see my post as follows about Sheila's unplanned pregnancies:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3955.msg164365.html#msg164365



NN,,Whether we like it or not,,we ALL carry genes. It's our makeup of what we are and who we are whether adopted or not. Whatever our genetic makeup consists of,shows itself in one form or another,,if not immediately,,then later on in life.
Family life at WHF,was very much the same as any other family life as far as I'm concerned,,,adopted or not. It's all hooey, this over-reaction about adoption--------------------sorry. A blooming excuse.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #49 on: March 04, 2013, 02:11:PM »


NN,,Whether we like it or not,,we ALL carry genes. It's our makeup of what we are and who we are whether adopted or not. Whatever our genetic makeup consists of,shows itself in one form or another,,if not immediately,,then later on in life.
Family life at WHF,was very much the same as any other family life as far as I'm concerned,,,adopted or not. It's all hooey, this over-reaction about adoption--------------------sorry. A blooming excuse.

Hi Lookout

This is true we do ALL carry genes from our birth parents.

I appreciate your personal views Lookout but I would respectfully point out that they do actually contradict all the evidence from professionals.  Are you able to provide any evidence by way of links etc to support your assertions.

You often raise valid points but there appears to be a lack of supporting evidence ie links to witness statements, external websites etc.  I recall once you liked some music Patti uploaded, Odyssey I think, and Patti said she was going to show you how to copy and paste etc?

Just going back to the genetics.  How can you account for the following:

June - mental illness requiring in-patient psychiatric care 1959 and 1983 (might be '81)

Sheila - mental illness requiring in-patient psychiatric care 1983 and 1985

Jeremy - convicted of murdering 5 members of his adoptive family 1986

Lookout please can you give your opinion:

Genetics = n/a

Randomness/coincidence?

Environment?



Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #50 on: March 04, 2013, 03:53:PM »
Hi Lookout

This is true we do ALL carry genes from our birth parents.

I appreciate your personal views Lookout but I would respectfully point out that they do actually contradict all the evidence from professionals.  Are you able to provide any evidence by way of links etc to support your assertions.

You often raise valid points but there appears to be a lack of supporting evidence ie links to witness statements, external websites etc.  I recall once you liked some music Patti uploaded, Odyssey I think, and Patti said she was going to show you how to copy and paste etc?

Just going back to the genetics.  How can you account for the following:

June - mental illness requiring in-patient psychiatric care 1959 and 1983 (might be '81)

Sheila - mental illness requiring in-patient psychiatric care 1983 and 1985

Jeremy - convicted of murdering 5 members of his adoptive family 1986

Lookout please can you give your opinion:

Genetics = n/a

Randomness/coincidence?

Environment?





First of all,,I don't refer to any information through links,,,it's purely lifes experiences coupled with my own views and not those of any" Doctor Spock "type gobbledegook.

As I've explained somewhere before,,,the pre-disposition to mental illness could well be already there,,,and any sort of trauma in your life will exacerbate that part of your brain,,as to whether you can control your feelings or suppress them altogether. It's all very complicated and in-depth that scientists haven't even worked out why some people act differently than others in a given situation.

Both Junes' and Sheilas' illnesses would have been hormonal,,,as an imbalance can and does cause all kinds of problems within the hormone producing glands in both men and women.
Pituitary,,,Adrenal,,,Thyroid,,,all produce hormones,,,the adrenal and thyroid give out the fight or flight hormone,,,and if these glands produce too much adrenaline and nor-adrenaline,left untreated,can go on to cause other problems round the body,,including the brain. Anxiety and depression are the two most common factors.

In women,during puberty,,those who suffer badly with PMT need to be treated asap,,as those sufferers have also been known to kill and their added strength can move mountains.
Junes' problen could have started from puberty,we don't know,,,but chances are,,she need not have been born to a family who suffered,,though it's usual on the maternal side  for a daughter to inherit  an ailment from the mother,,,but not always.

Sheila,we know,,was sexually active at 17, ( promiscuous I'd have said ) we've no information before then. When,in full view,she was caught by June,in the field with a farm worker. Inevitably pregnant,,,then whisked to the GP to make further arrangements. A further two terminations ,,,all added to a fragile mind of a young woman.Losing 3 pregnancies would be enough to make any young person " fall over the edge ",,,and whether Sheila ever had counselling after her " losses ",,I don't know.

Abortion isn't my idea of birth control. I find this part of Sheila difficult for me to understand.
To be quite honest,,,I would have said that having been in that situation alone,,,was enough to send her insane. She'd have wondered how those children would have turned out,etc etc,,,and part of her possibly had flashbacks. As life progressed,,she then got married and had a further pregnancy which resulted in the twins,,after having had to stay in hospital for a while beforehand.

There's no telling who can develop mental illness,,,except that it can be environmental,,,plus many other things combined,,drugs,alcohol,violence,abuse. It doesn't always show itself.People can be all smiles,but behind the smiles nobody can detect what's going on in the brain.

Jeremy is a different subject matter,,and so different. But that's not to say that his birth mother was different to Sheilas'. He is just a different character which you get in most blood-related families,as well as adoptive. My brother and myself both had the same parents,,but we're as different as chalk and cheese. As are both my daughters. They are individuals,,,not clones.
I have twin great/grandchildren who are also different in every way. Granted ,,they didn't share a " sac " ,,but even so,,when you say twins,,you expect mirror images,,,but no,,,,,,,,different  pigmentations,,,,different characters altogether.

Jeremy on the other hand,,,because he must have been far easier to cope with,,,was probably revered a bit more than Sheila was,,and if Sheila had sensed this in any way,,there may have been ructions with her,,,but really,I think the Bambers did the best they could with both children. Probably better than some blood parents,,,as that's why I don't attach any importance to " adoption " because it's a part of natural life if you wish it to be so. Life is what you make it,,and not how someone else dictates it to be.   

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #51 on: March 04, 2013, 05:06:PM »
[quote author=lookout link=topic=3974.msg164509#msg164509 date=136241..............
Jeremy on the other hand,,,because he must have been far easier to cope with,,,was probably revered a bit more than Sheila was,,and if Sheila had sensed this in any way,,there may have been ructions with her,,,but really,I think the Bambers did the best they could with both children. Probably better than some blood parents,,,as that's why I don't attach any importance to " adoption " because it's a part of natural life if you wish it to be so. Life is what you make it,,and not how someone else dictates it to be.
[/quote]

Lookout, I so agree with what you have said that I could have written it myself :) I also agree that Jeremy was easier to cope with than Sheila partly, IMO, because June could have ignored his own burgeoning sexuality. She may not have approved of him having sex outside of marriage but any repurcussions wouldn't come quite as close to home.

I want to stress that what I say next comes ENTIRELY from my own experience. I can't say whether June's fixed views stemmed from faith in her all punishing, unforgiving God or her mental illness, but I suspect that she had lived in fear of Sheila going down a certain road, which may have resulted in pushing Sheila down it in a search for the validation she felt June withheld from her. I will agree that the Bambers both did the best they could. They were good people BUT Sheila and Jeremy weren't responsible for whatever were June's own private demons.

You attach no importance to "adoption." I have to. I was reminded of it on an almost daily basis, it was part of reminding me of the debt I owed and the reason my life couldn't be what I made it, it was what my mother told me it would be. In a strange way, it was almost a relief to learn how June was with Sheila. It cuts through moments when I can't believe it had been that awful and perhaps I exaggerated. I remember June and I know it was because it happened to Sheila, too. HOWEVER, Sheila is the only other adoptee I know who suffered the same mental and emotional abuse as I and two people do not a statistic make and despite my experience, I fully support adoption.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #52 on: March 04, 2013, 07:01:PM »
Thankyou so much for your response,,April........However I see and experience life,,I write it and don't feel the need for text-books. I've followed my own instincts having borne two children and " taken on " another two , as was the  "bargain" when I got married,,,and continued with four children quite happily with no stigma attached,,and certainly no reminding them that they weren't mine.

What I meant to say about not attaching any importance to adoption,,is that integration shouldn't feel alien ,,,,,and acceptability of the child or children should be as natural as your own maternal feelings allow. 
I understand that everyone is different,,,but I just know from a personal point of view that there are some things in life that require a duty to be carried out,,and that duty to me was to keep the family as one without  discrimination,,or feelings of " being different ".
 

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #53 on: March 04, 2013, 07:14:PM »
Thankyou so much for your response,,April........However I see and experience life,,I write it and don't feel the need for text-books. I've followed my own instincts having borne two children and " taken on " another two , as was the  "bargain" when I got married,,,and continued with four children quite happily with no stigma attached,,and certainly no reminding them that they weren't mine.

What I meant to say about not attaching any importance to adoption,,is that integration shouldn't feel alien ,,,,,and acceptability of the child or children should be as natural as your own maternal feelings allow. 
I understand that everyone is different,,,but I just know from a personal point of view that there are some things in life that require a duty to be carried out,,and that duty to me was to keep the family as one without  discrimination,,or feelings of " being different ".
Hi lookout, I would imagine you forgot which were whose didn't you?  I know I mostly forget I didn't bear my children and that they were adopted, having said that I hope I have also taught them to honour their natural mothers.  As you say, they are children who they come from shouldn't matter.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #54 on: March 05, 2013, 09:34:AM »




First of all,,I don't refer to any information through links,,,it's purely lifes experiences coupled with my own views and not those of any " Doctor Spock "type gobbledegook.

As I've explained somewhere before,,,the pre-disposition to mental illness could well be already there,,,and any sort of trauma in your life will exacerbate that part of your brain,,as to whether you can control your feelings or suppress them altogether. It's all very complicated and in-depth that scientists haven't even worked out why some people act differently than others in a given situation.

Both Junes' and Sheilas' illnesses would have been hormonal,,,as an imbalance can and does cause all kinds of problems within the hormone producing glands in both men and women.
Pituitary,,,Adrenal,,,Thyroid,,,all produce hormones,,,the adrenal and thyroid give out the fight or flight hormone,,,and if these glands produce too much adrenaline and nor-adrenaline,left untreated,can go on to cause other problems round the body,,including the brain. Anxiety and depression are the two most common factors.

In women,during puberty,,those who suffer badly with PMT need to be treated asap,,as those sufferers have also been known to kill and their added strength can move mountains.
Junes' problen could have started from puberty,we don't know,,,but chances are,,she need not have been born to a family who suffered,,though it's usual on the maternal side  for a daughter to inherit  an ailment from the mother,,,but not always.

Sheila,we know,,was sexually active at 17,( promiscious I'd have said) we've no information before then. When,in full view,she was caught by June,in the field with a farm worker. Inevitably pregnant,,,then whisked to the GP to make further arrangements. A further two terminations ,,,all added to a fragile mind of a young woman.Losing 3 pregnancies would be enough to make any young person " fall over the edge ",,,and whether Sheila ever had counselling after her " losses ",,I don't know.]Abortion isn't my idea of birth control. I find this part of Sheila difficult for me to understand.
To be quite honest,,,I would have said that having been in that situation alone,,,was enough to send her insane. She'd have wondered how those children would have turned out,etc etc,,,and part of her possibly had flashbacks. As life progressed,,she then got married and had a further pregnancy which resulted in the twins,,after having had to stay in hospital for a while beforehand.


There's no telling who can develop mental illness,,,except that it can be environmental,,,plus many other things combined,,drugs,alcohol,violence,abuse. It doesn't always show itself.People can be all smiles,but behind the smiles nobody can detect what's going on in the brain.

Jeremy is a different subject matter,,and so different. But that's not to say that his birth mother was different to Sheilas'. He is just a different character which you get in most blood-related families,as well as adoptive. My brother and myself both had the same parents,,but we're as different as chalk and cheese. As are both my daughters. They are individuals,,,not clones.
I have twin great/grandchildren who are also different in every way. Granted ,,they didn't share a " sac " ,,but even so,,when you say twins,,you expect mirror images,,,but no,,,,,,,,different  pigmentations,,,,different characters altogether.

Jeremy on the other hand,,,because he must have been far easier to cope with,,,was probably revered a bit more than Sheila was,,and if Sheila had sensed this in any way,,there may have been ructions with her,,,but really,I think the Bambers did the best they could with both children. Probably better than some blood parents,,,as that's why I don't attach any importance to " adoption " because it's a part of natural life if you wish it to be so. Life is what you make it,,and not how someone else dictates it to be.

Morning Lookout

I've highlighted above the sections I've responded to in your war and peace post  ;D

I think you're being somewhat unfair to professionals who have spent years studying such matters under scientific conditions.  Sure have your own views but those alone are not going to carry weight unless you can back them up with some evidence.

Of course Sheila could be pre-disposed to some mental illness due to her genetics but what are the statistical chances of both adoptive mother and adopted daughter both having mental illness when there's no shared genetics?  In this case it is much more likely to be caused by the environement ie external rather than internal.  The statistical likelihood of this not being the case is very unlikely.  It might be worth noting that no such problems existed between PB and AE and as far as I'm aware between Sheila's birth mother and her children.

I know you don't like my links Lookout but tough because one's coming up now  ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginity

You need to scroll down a fair way to see a table on the rhs re average age of losing virginity.  The Durex gold survey in 2005 found the average age of a person losing his/her virginity was 17.3 years  globally.  However I accept back in the mid 70's this figure may have been slightly higher.  Re the unplanned pregnancies and not seeing abortion as a means of birth control I agree given then that  contraception was widely available but do you think June ever broached the subject of sexual relationships and contraception with Sheila and Jeremy?  Probably not given that she expected them to remain virgins until marriage.  Why would an attractive girl from a middle class adoptive family, well educated and genetically from a family of academics (I believe her birth parents were students) want to get pregnant at 17 and drift around aimlessly?  You and others will blame it on her mental illness, gentic predisposition etc but I choose to believe in adoption psychology.  I doubt if she had any counselling for her losses but did June have any counselling for her losses ie not having a birth child?  Another link coming up...are you getting  >:( >:( >:(?  Plse see 'loss' section:

http://www.fairfamilies.org/2012/1999/99LifelongIssues.htm

What do you mean "that's not to say his birth mother was different to Sheila's"?  They are just two people at random why would they have anything in common whatsoever?  Other than having a child outside of wedlock and giving the child up for adoption which was the norm during that era.

I agree the Bambers had good intentions but I also agree with Wilkes when he states that they were totally unsuitable adoptive parents and I'm very thankful that I wasn't adopted into that family.  I often wonder how I would have fared had I have been adopted by them.  Can you see me getting on with June? 

Jeremy was/is a much stronger character as evidenced by his stoic behaviour during his long incaceration.  He was able to brush off June's bible bashing.  Sheila on the other hand took it all to heart and was made to feel quite literally like the Devil's child until she met her birth mother a few weeks before the murders.  Her view of June, and possibly Nevill, then started to change.  My opinion of course.




Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #55 on: March 05, 2013, 10:45:AM »
NN,,I'm so glad that I'm not as sad a person as yourself,,using references to dictate what,and how your life should be mapped out. 
Goodness me.
There's no handbook available for rearing children,you go by, and use your own instincts and not those of others. No two children are alike,,whether they be adopted or not. Why this unnatural attitude/obsession towards adoption anyway.? As I've said before,,life is what you make it.

There are probably more birth parents who are unsuitable,than adoptive ones,,,so that argument doesn't hold water,,,and how anyone purporting to be professional can say that the Bambers were unsuitable as adoptive parents,,,wants shooting. I think that's a despicable remark from anyone.
I would have got on with June,,,,but then I'm obviously a more tolerant person than yourself who expects the impossible in life,,and wants everyone to jump to your attention. Sorry,,but that's not for me,as I'm more than happy toddling along and fitting in with what others do. I've never craved attention,,and it gets on my nerves to those who do.

 I personally think June was a lovely person in her own way. The fact that she was a depressive showed the sensitive side to her,,,and if Sheila had behaved herself,,the two of them could have been the best of friends...The poor woman had done her best in the most difficult of circumstances,,,,and I stress,,,it had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Sheila was adopted.  Except,,,like yourself,,Sheila made a big issue of it until the whole process blew up out of all proportion.. Adopted or not,,,any family can have a " black sheep ",,,,I'm trying to stress here, that it doesn't just happen to adoptive families.

I also felt damn sorry for June as well having to be faced with what MOST of us went through with teenagers. Some of whom can be level-headed,,but others complete and utter monsters overnight.  Again,,unless you've had dealings in that area,then I fail to see how you can pass comment. No matter what doctor,consultant,professor says,,,nobody on this earth can prepare you for a teenager who rebels in every way possible,,be it sexual,drinking,cigarettes or drugs. It's no easy feat by anyones' standards.

 
I will not,,and have never been dictated to on family matters whatever it might be. The PC brigade can take a running jump as far as I'm concerned. They know nothing.!

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #56 on: March 05, 2013, 10:49:AM »
Thankyou so much for your response,,April........However I see and experience life,,I write it and don't feel the need for text-books. I've followed my own instincts having borne two children and " taken on " another two , as was the  "bargain" when I got married,,,and continued with four children quite happily with no stigma attached,,and certainly no reminding them that they weren't mine.

What I meant to say about not attaching any importance to adoption,,is that integration shouldn't feel alien ,,,,,and acceptability of the child or children should be as natural as your own maternal feelings allow. 
I understand that everyone is different,,,but I just know from a personal point of view that there are some things in life that require a duty to be carried out,,and that duty to me was to keep the family as one without  discrimination,,or feelings of " being different ".



Lookout there's really no comparison between your family or that of the Bambers, mine, possibly April's ?, and most other adoptive families from the 'closed' adoption system.

Firstly, you had your own birth children so you were not left wondering about a birth child.

Secondly, your step-children did not have ?'s about their past.  They knew who their ancestors were including their birth mother albeit she may not have been 'fit for purpose' according to you or as psychologists say she failed to meet the "good enough" criteria.  No mother is perfect.  They knew who their birth father was as they lived with him along with their siblings.  They knew who they looked like as they saw reflections of themselves every day amongst family members.  They no doubt shared many similar non-physical characteristics too due to their shared genetics. 

I was told at a very young age I was adopted.  I wasn't told explicitly this is off limits for futher discussion but implicitly that was how I understood it and the subject was very rarely broached again ever.  The only thing I knew about my past was that I was born in Cambridge until I was in my early 20's and went to the adoption agency to look at my file.

This is how 'closed' adoptions were socially engineered Lookout.  It was STRICTLY SECRET.  Only social workers, courts and the register general were able to match the two ie adoptive family and birth family.  Both parties ie adoptive and birth had very limited unidentifying information about one another.  Adoptees even had new birth certificates!!!  It was engineered 'as if' the adoptee had been born to the adoptive parents. 

The law changed in 1975 allowing adoptees access to their original birth certificates which in turn allowed them access to their adoption file and obviously the possibility of reuniting with their birth families.

See geneaological bewilderment for the most common reasons why adoptees want to know about their past and most do:

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=genealogical%20bewilderment&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FGenealogical_bewilderment&ei=W8o1UauUIaqa0QW3t4CIAg&usg=AFQjCNGja4-T6uX5okmZQu2EHOThNIx17g&bvm=bv.43148975,d.d2k

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #57 on: March 05, 2013, 11:20:AM »
NN,,I'm so glad that I'm not as sad a person as yourself,,using references to dictate what,and how your life should be mapped out. 
Goodness me.
There's no handbook available for rearing children,you go by, and use your own instincts and not those of others. No two children are alike,,whether they be adopted or not. Why this unnatural attitude/obsession towards adoption anyway.? As I've said before,,life is what you make it.

There are probably more birth parents who are unsuitable,than adoptive ones,,,so that argument doesn't hold water,,,and how anyone purporting to be professional can say that the Bambers were unsuitable as adoptive parents,,,wants shooting. I think that's a despicable remark from anyone.
I would have got on with June,,,,but then I'm obviously a more tolerant person than yourself who expects the impossible in life,,and wants everyone to jump to your attention. Sorry,,but that's not for me,as I'm more than happy toddling along and fitting in with what others do. I've never craved attention,,and it gets on my nerves to those who do.

 I personally think June was a lovely person in her own way. The fact that she was a depressive showed the sensitive side to her,,,and if Sheila had behaved herself ,,the two of them could have been the best of friends...The poor woman had done her best in the most difficult of circumstances,,,,and I stress,,,it had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that Sheila was adopted.  Except,,,like yourself,,Sheila made a big issue of it until the whole process blew up out of all proportion.. Adopted or not,,,any family can have a " black sheep ",,,,I'm trying to stress here, that it doesn't just happen to adoptive families.

I also felt damn sorry for June as well having to be faced with what MOST of us went through with teenagers. Some of whom can be level-headed,,but others complete and utter monsters overnight.  Again,,unless you've had dealings in that area,then I fail to see how you can pass comment. No matter what doctor,consultant,professor says,,,nobody on this earth can prepare you for a teenager who rebels in every way possible,,be it sexual,drinking,cigarettes or drugs. It's no easy feat by anyones' standards.

 
I will not,,and have never been dictated to on family matters whatever it might be. The PC brigade can take a running jump as far as I'm concerned. They know nothing.!


Well Lookout hopefully you did use references when you were working as a SRN and mental health nurse!!!

Since you have no experience of 'closed' adoption either practically or theoretically what makes YOU think YOU should be listened to?  Do YOU honestly expect any poster to take YOUR comments seriously when it is quite clear that YOU have absolutely no idea what YOU are talking about.  Other posters who have no experience of adoption, which are most, state they have no experience/knowlege but no not our Lookout the authority on everything!!! Lol  ;D ;D ;D

Your comments highlighted above are sickening and disgusting.  Sheila was brought up by a mentally ill adoptive mother who had ambivalent feelings about adopting illegitimate children partly bound up with her religious fanaticism all of which she projected onto Sheila resulting in low self-esteem, under-achievement at school, inability to form stable relationships, mental illness etc, etc.  Sheila should have been removed from the Bambers in 1959 and placed with an adoptive family with a proven track record.  The Bambers should have been prevented from ever adopting again.  They were TOTALLY unsuitable and this is borne out by the sad outcomes.

You find me a psychiatirst, psychologist or social woker in the land that disagrees with the statement above?

Some of us Lookout are not taken in by outward appearances!!! 

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #58 on: March 05, 2013, 11:44:AM »
Packagebuilder hun I've scooped you up from another thread and dragged you kicking and screaming here with your post as follows:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3989.msg164644.html#msg164644

The above is interesting as there are other similarities:

Both were adopted at birth

Both had at one time been hairdressers (Sheila despite coming from a family of academics - no offence to hairdressers)

Both had been renuited with their birth mothers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1376660/Leighton-Buzzard-train-passenger-grieving-killing-son.html

There's also much evidence from Dr Susan Gair that adoptees are at a greater risk of suicide than their non-adopted peers:

http://www.virtualmedicalcentre.com/news/exploring-links-between-past-adoptions-and-suicide/13426


Offline big-goolies

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 619
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #59 on: March 05, 2013, 11:45:AM »
surely the whole point to this arguement is that children growing up to become dysfunctional adults is not down to genes
both JB and SC grew up to have problems and it must have come from thier upbringing