Something is handwritten on the reverse of both page 1 log contents, where it could only have been written on one of them, this opens up the possibility that on the reverse of Bonnets 3.26am log, was recorded more details about the call made by Ralph to police on that occasion, as opposed to the continuation of PC Wests log on the reverse of his log dealing with the call from Jeremy at 3.36am...
What makes this interesting is that Bonnets log (3.26am) suggests that he (Bonnet) received the information he recorded from 1990 (PC West) in this log, but the contents which Bonnet records do not match that which PC West later records on page 1 of his log at 3.36am. The key feature which needs looking into now, is what was / is recorded on the reverse of the front page of each of both logs, since, as I have said, both logs were created by two different people, in different locations, at different times, and anything handwritten on the reverse of one, could not possibly match that which was written on the reverse of the other (unless photocopied onto the back of one or other later on). This leads me to conclude that written on the reverse of Bonnets original page 1 of his 3.26am log, are details relating to the call made by the father to the police, whilst Jeremy himself was or may have been speaking to the police himself...
If this proves to be the case, then of course, Jeremy would be vindicated, since if his father (Ralph) was speaking to police on one line, whilst part of Jeremys call to police was taking place on another, where both calls partly over lapped. There may be some evidence of this contained on the reverse of PC Wests log (3.36am) when you take into account reference to the GPO calling whf and declaring that the phone has been left off the hook. This is a remarkable piece of information considering that from 3.36am that Jeremy was speaking to the police. Jeremys call to police lasted about 10 / 11 minutes which puts the termination of his call at around 3.46 / 3.47am, some five minutes or so after West records the fact that at 3.42am the GPO had established the phone at the farmhouse had been left off the hook...
What this means, is that for a period of 5 or 6 minutes, there may have been an overlap of the call from the father to police, and Jeremys call to police, an overlap which spanned the period 3.36am to 3.42am, the details of which are recorded on the reverse of the original page 1 of Bonnets (3.26am) log...
If this proves to be the case, then of course, Jeremy is in the clear...
