Why does Mike Tesko not answer a direct question with a direct answer?

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

I have been following this forum for about  a month, a newbie I know but I only took an interest in this case sine it appeared in the newspapers on 31st Jan 2011.
 
Since then I have read much and watched numerous videos about the case.

I have not yet formed an opinion about Jeremy Bambers guilt or innocence.

However, I do take exception to the owner of this forum only answering the question he choose too.

Mike Tesko if you are asked a question please answer, either yes, no or don't know with comments to support your answer.

But please stop posting new threads about things that have already been discussed.

I expect my membership to this site may be removed following this post but I feel what I said needed to be said.

[Tricksy]

I have been following this forum for about  a month, a newbie I know but I only took an interest in this case sine it appeared in the newspapers on 31st Jan 2011.
 
Since then I have read much and watched numerous videos about the case.

I have not yet formed an opinion about Jeremy Bambers guilt or innocence.

However, I do take exception to the owner of this forum only answering the question he choose too.

Mike Tesko if you are asked a question please answer, either yes, no or don't know with comments to support your answer.

But please stop posting new threads about things that have already been discussed.

I expect my membership to this site may be removed following this post but I feel what I said needed to be said.

I hope it doesn't get removed! 

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

Thanks for that Tricksy 

[mike tesko]

I will answer any question, providing that I am given an opportunity to explain the reasoning behind such an answer first, to prevent anyone misrepresenting what I might have to say. Some of the questions require more than a yes and no answer...

[Tricksy]

Thanks for that Tricksy 

Your welcome. 

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

I will answer any question, providing that I am given an opportunity to explain the reasoning behind such an answer first, to prevent anyone misrepresenting what I might have to say. Some of the questions require more than a yes and no answer...

This is one example, please will you post the picture of the petticoat you alledged was worn by Sheila Caffell on the night of the murders yes or no? If no why not since you have previously posted the picture on this forum but the link no longer works.
I would also welcome your opinions on the photograph and would expect more than a yes or no response.

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

Oh look Mike Tesko has yet again chose to ignore my question and instead has started new threads without answering outstanding questions from older threads.

[mike tesko]

Oh look Mike Tesko has yet again chose to ignore my question and instead has started new threads without answering outstanding questions from older threads.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not allowed to post the photograph of the petticoat, that was the reason why it got removed in the first instance...

Sorry...

[Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi)]

I am not allowed to post the photograph of the petticoat, that was the reason why it got removed in the first instance...

Sorry...

Thank you Mike that is all I was asking for.

[mike tesko]

I am not allowed to post the photograph of the petticoat, that was the reason why it got removed in the first instance...

Sorry...

Thank you Mike that is all I was asking for.

--------------------------------------------------

I can leave the posts and document copies which have already been posted to date, here on this site, but because of the agreement I have with Jeremy, I cannot post material which is new, or which may be relevant to the CCRC application...

Except in extenuating circumstances...