Author Topic: She's got the gun  (Read 29743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #270 on: February 09, 2013, 09:08:AM »
Morning BG

Were you the Judge presiding at the Trial ;D ;D ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #271 on: February 09, 2013, 10:32:AM »
Morning BG

Were you the Judge presiding at the Trial ;D ;D ;D


No answer came the firm reply. ;D Good morning Susan.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #272 on: February 09, 2013, 11:28:AM »

 
The larger question was why he rang local police and not 999

Ask him!

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #273 on: February 09, 2013, 01:47:PM »

B.G,,,in a court of law,,you can't say that if it wasn't one,,it must have been the other.
What happened to a full investigation,,or at best,,a re-trial.?

Why not? If the defendant made it so with his own evidence.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #274 on: February 09, 2013, 01:51:PM »
Why not? If the defendant made it so with his own evidence.


He had no choice from what I've noticed. Who else could anyone blame when one couldn't speak at all.?
It had been a case of the last man standing.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #275 on: February 09, 2013, 02:07:PM »

He had no choice from what I've noticed. Who else could anyone blame when one couldn't speak at all.?
It had been a case of the last man standing.

Nothing to do with last man standing. He made it a case of one or the other when he told the police that his father had called him saying Sheila had the gun.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #276 on: February 09, 2013, 02:18:PM »
Nothing to do with last man standing. He made it a case of one or the other when he told the police that his father had called him saying Sheila had the gun.


It was the way it was interpreted,,,,,to suit. The police,etc can be very selective you know.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #277 on: February 09, 2013, 02:22:PM »

It was the way it was interpreted,,,,,to suit. The police,etc can be very selective you know.

How else would you interpret it? If the phone call happened as he said it did Sheila did it. If the phone call didn't happen JB did it.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #278 on: February 09, 2013, 02:23:PM »
How else would you interpret it? If the phone call happened as he said it did Sheila did it. If the phone call didn't happen JB did it.


Well I wouldn't jump to any conclusions that's for sure.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #279 on: February 09, 2013, 02:26:PM »

Well I wouldn't jump to any conclusions that's for sure.

How else would you interpret it?
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #280 on: February 09, 2013, 02:39:PM »
How else would you interpret it?


But both phone-calls did happen,,as cars were sent from different directions/locations,arriving within minutes of each other,,so no argument as far as I'm concerned. If Jeremy hadn't had such a weak defence at the time,,then that part of the case could have been solved.

If it had been said that it was one or the other,,then I'd have looked beyond Sheila and Jeremy,,not tossed a coin.

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #281 on: February 09, 2013, 02:43:PM »

But both phone-calls did happen,,as cars were sent from different directions/locations,arriving within minutes of each other,,so no argument as far as I'm concerned. If Jeremy hadn't had such a weak defence at the time,,then that part of the case could have been solved.

If it had been said that it was one or the other,,then I'd have looked beyond Sheila and Jeremy,,not tossed a coin.
The fact that "Two" cars were sent and not one should be sufficient answer that two phone calls were made.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #282 on: February 09, 2013, 02:44:PM »

But both phone-calls did happen,,as cars were sent from different directions/locations,arriving within minutes of each other,,so no argument as far as I'm concerned. If Jeremy hadn't had such a weak defence at the time,,then that part of the case could have been solved.

If it had been said that it was one or the other,,then I'd have looked beyond Sheila and Jeremy,,not tossed a coin.

Whether or not you believe the dispatch of cars proves the phone call (personally I don't believe it for a second), the phone call itself narrows the suspect to list to two. Based on JBs own evidence as to that phone call it could only have been him or Sheila.
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #283 on: February 09, 2013, 02:58:PM »
Whether or not you believe the dispatch of cars proves the phone call (personally I don't believe it for a second), the phone call itself narrows the suspect to list to two. Based on JBs own evidence as to that phone call it could only have been him or Sheila.

It's not Jeremys' fault that he can't call upon his father to justify that he's telling the truth. How unfair the trial was.

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: She's got the gun
« Reply #284 on: February 09, 2013, 03:06:PM »
It's not Jeremys' fault that he can't call upon his father to justify that he's telling the truth. How unfair the trial was.

With respect, that's hardly the point. JB gave an account of the supposed phone call, and that account limited the suspect list to two.
....just cos I eat worms...