0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Steve,,why go rooting for kitchen knives when there's a whole arsenal at your disposal.?
..and yet Sheila never even took a kitchen knife from the drawer in any previous psychosis. I've just been watching Princess Diana:The Secret Tapes on youtube where Diana took Charles' penknife and slashed herself in front of him,and Charles never batted an eyelid.Of course there are violent people out there with schizophrenia who should be locked up for their own safety as well as the public's. But they have no relevance to the Jeremy Bamber case whatsoever,because you are all projecting your preconceived notions of how schizophrenics act in the same way Jeremy Bamber did in an attempt to hoodwink which very nearly succeeded.So Nicola Edgington killed another woman on Bexley High Street in broad daylight. I'll highlight another example of an Eastern European who decapitated a woman's head in Tenerife a couple of years ago and ran off with it. You're not telling me anything I don't know. But you all can learn something. These people are mad in the true sense of the word,there is no rational ulterior motive behind their deeds,nor do they prevent outside forces (or Nevill) from calling for help by cutting off someone in the middle of a telephone call. They are in psychosis,they don't know what they are doing,and I doubt that the vast majority end up committing suicide after such a rampage.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386762/British-woman-beheaded-Tenerife-machete.html#axzz2KDl2Sm3R
..because to commit the five murders one would have thought that Sheila had "previous" to use the prison jargon,but all I can come up with is Sheila's self-harm of putting her wrist through a window just as Diana slashed herself with Charles' penknife,and hurling a few pots and pans at Colin aiming to miss.
Completely predictable!
What about all those murderers who don't have "previous"? Does that make them all innocent? Also what about Jeremy's "previous"?
Jeremy's previous was petty theft,a con man. Sheila's illness is far more difficult to predict and I can understand why the Jeremy supporters wish to focus all their energies on it(to the detriment of discussing Jeremy's evil scheme). However schizophrenics usually have a history of instability if not actual bodily violence against others which was absent in Sheila's case.
No she just flung pots and pans at Colin - ouch...I think it's been well documented that Sheila was unstable and couldn't take care of her children.
But that's no reason to get rid of them. You can't have Sheila as a calculated schemer who wishes to avenge the divorce and also in a grip of psychosis which as we have read from the examples quoted tonight do not follow any rigid pattern.