Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891807 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5280 on: July 23, 2020, 10:32:PM »
The vicious rape was committed by a masked man who spoke English in a German accent. This was in 2005

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5281 on: July 24, 2020, 01:29:AM »
Red flag (24) -

Then something rather astonishing happens because Kate informs us all that after discovering the disappearance and in house search for Madeliene that she ran outside looking for her!

Red flag (26) - Whichever door Kate McCann used to enter apartment 5A at the time of her 10.00pm check it has not yet been explained whether or not the door in question was closed shut upon entry behind her. Bear in mind, that once Kate had ran outside of the door of the premises to look around outside that the door in question was the lockable roadside door, and not the poolside patio door.- she would not have needed the key to exit this door because the lock on the inside of the door could be opened from the inside, by the turn of a switch irrespective of whether or not a key was inserted in the lock itself!

Red flag (27) - If you exited this door by adopting this technique and you pulled the door shut behind you (to look for Madeliene), the door would self lock automatically and you would not be able to re-enter the apartment via that door unless you had the key to the lock of that door. If you needed to get back into the apartment you would have to go around to the poolside of block 5 and use the unlocked patio door..

Red flag (28) - But, Kate makes no mention of returning back into the premises,  after a frantic search outside for Madeliene. Also she doesn't mention whether or not she closed the door behind her as she left the apartment, and or if it slammed shut itself behind her because of a vacuum caused by an open bedroom window with its metal shutter raised up, and the patio door on the poolside of the building had been left open upon her initial entry.

Red flag (29) - She then hurries back to the restaurant to inform all the other members of the group, that 'Madeliene is gone' , and 'they have taken her' - but how could she have told all the other members of the group these things at the restaurant after 10.00pm, because there was no-one there after 9.30pm, including Kate McCann herself (other than Diane Webster from 9.45pm onwards)...
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 01:46:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5282 on: July 24, 2020, 01:49:AM »

Red flag (29) - She then hurries back to the restaurant to inform all the other members of the group, that 'Madeliene is gone' , and 'they have taken her' - but how could she have told all the other members of the group these things at the restaurant after 10.00pm, because there was no-one there after 9.30pm, including Kate McCann herself (other than Diane Webster from 9.45pm onwards)...

Red flag (30) - upon being alerted by Kate McCann that Madeliene was missing, everyone got up from the dining table and dashed back to the McCann apartment!  But, how could this possibly have been true by 10.00pm because they had all left the tapas bar restaurant at around 9.30pm. Not only that but also there were many people who had been present in the tapas bar restaurant at around 9.15pm that had known that a toddler had gone missing from one of the Ocean clubs apartments, Also, bear in mind that 15 minutes earlier (9.00pm) Mathew Oldfield had entered the McCanns apartment and discovered Madeliene  to be missing that's an hour before Kate McCanns alleged alert was given at 10.00pm..
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 02:08:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5283 on: July 24, 2020, 02:18:AM »
Red flag (31) - If Mathew Oldfield discovered Madeliene the to be missing from the McCann apartment at 9.00pm, why would he not tell the parents and the other members of the group (and Ocean club members of staff) that she had gone missing from apartment 5A? But he did Gerald McCann and which from 9.05pm onwards, and was the reason why he went back to apartment 5A. So by that stage (9.00pm - 9.05pm)at least two people knew Madeliene had gone missing (Mathew Oldfield and Gerald McCann)..

By 9.15pm, at least a further two, possibly three more people knew that a toddler had gone missing from one of the Ocean clubs apartment (a couple sat at a dining table, and an Ocean Club supervisor who overheard their conversation), So, by that stage there were as many as four or five people who knew about the missing three year old toddler.

Red flag (32) - the fact that Jane Tanner left the Ocean Club within five minutes (9.10pm) of Gerald McCann (9.05pm), for two purposes is worrying in the sense that Kate McCann (and possibly others) were concerned regarding the length of time Gerald McCann was taking to do a check at apartment 5A as a result of what Mathew Oldfield had had told about Madeliene and being missing from the McCann apartment. Kate had supposedly mentioned to Jane Tanner that Gerald McCann was probably watching football on sky TV. Undaunted by Kates reassuring comment Jane Tanner left anyway to check on her own apartment and child (9.10pm) but, what if this was not true?  What if Jane Tanner went to make sure her daughter was not the toddler who had gone missing?
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 03:41:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5284 on: July 24, 2020, 03:27:AM »
Red flag (33) - at 9.20pm - 9.30pm Kate got to her feet at the tapas bar restaurant intent on going back to apartment 5A, but for some reason Mathew Oldfield and Russell O'Brien talked her out of it. They volunteered to go and see what the state of play was back at the McCann apartment (9.20pm - 9.30pm).My instinct regarding this part of the McCann entourage script is that Kate wanted to go back to her apartment to see for herself the state of play, because by that stage her husband and Jane Tanner had not yet returned back to the tapas bar restaurant, and despite them both leaving to go there at 9.05pm and 9.10pm respectively...

Here exists support for the contention that at least four members of the group were absent from the dining table in the tapas bar restaurant by 9.30pm, namely, Gerald McCann, Jane Tanner, Mathew Oldfield and Russell O'Brien, leaving the other five members of the group at the dining table (9.20pm)..
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 03:43:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5285 on: July 24, 2020, 03:38:AM »
Red flag (33) - at 9.20pm - 9.30pm Kate got to her feet at the tapas bar restaurant intent on going back to apartment 5A, but for some reason Mathew Oldfield and Russell O'Brien talked her out of it. They volunteered to go and see what the state of play was back at the McCann apartment (9.20pm - 9.30pm).My instinct regarding this part of the McCann entourage script is that Kate wanted to go back to her apartment to see for herself the state of play, and because by that stage her husband and Jane Tanner had not yet returned back to the tapas bar restaurant, and despite them both leaving to go there at 9.05pm and 9.10pm respectively...

Here exists support for the contention that at least four members of the group were absent from the dining table in the tapas bar restaurant by 9.30pm, namely, Gerald McCann, Jane Tanner, Mathew Oldfield and Russell O'Brien, leaving the other five members of the group at the dining table (9.20pm)..

Red flag (34) - The five remaining group members who remained at the dining table in the restaurant (9.20pm), were Kate McCann, Rachel Mampilly, David Payne, Fiona Payne and Diane Webster. However, by 9.30pm something caused all of them to depart from the tapas bar restaurant and return to apartment 5A, or their own apartments and in the immediate vicinity of block five in particular

Red flag (35) - the following is my explanation for why these five adult members of the group remained behind at the dining table in the tapas bar restaurant - David Payne,  Fiona Payne and Diane Webster shared the same apartment and were the only family to possess and use their own electronic baby monitoring device, and so they thought there was no need to be physically present and back in their apartment. Kate McCann knew that her husband (Gerald McCann) was dealing with the situation in apartment 5A. Rachel Mamphilly knew that Mathew Oldfield was absent dealing with the situation. Both Russell O'Brien and Jane Tanner were absent from the dining table at 9.30pm, dealing with the ongoing crisis...
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 04:17:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5286 on: July 24, 2020, 04:42:AM »
Red flag (36) - Close scrutiny of the facts as told by or relied upon by members of the McCann parents and the other 7 adult members known as the tapas 7 group, confirms that all members of the tapas 9 group knew about the disappearance of 3 year old Madeliene McCann from Apartment 5A at varying stages between 9.00pm and 9.30pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, or sooner...

The reason why they have deliberately misled the Portuguese authorities, by extending the period when it first became known (9.00pm) by all concerned that Madeliene was missing being delayed by one hour to 10.00pm, and the name of the person responsible for alerting to the occasion when it was first discovered that Madeliene was gone in the script for that date (Mathew Oldfield [9.00pm] to Kate McCann [10.00pm] is compelling evidence which goes toward proving that the McCann parents and other group members played one role or another in the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of the 3 year old toddler..

Red flag (37) - Gerald McCann deliberately lied about him seeing Madeliene alive and sleeping soundly in her bed during his 9.05pm check of apartment 5A on the evening of 3rd May 2007.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 05:27:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5287 on: July 24, 2020, 09:32:AM »
Red flag (37) - If Gerald McCann returned back at the tapas bar restuarant  at 9.20pm from his check of apartment 5A (9.05pm), what was the point of Kate McCann getting up from the dining table intent on checking it again because her husband had just checked it? Just as somewhat bizarre as Mathew  Oldfield and Russell O'Brien volunteering to do that check on her behalf  when either Gerald McCann had not yet returned and he had been absent from the tapas bar restaurant  since 9.05pm, or had only just returned (9.20pm), plus, the fact that Mathew Oldfield knew that at 9.00pm when he had been inside the McCann apartment Madeliene  was not there, and Gerald McCann  had not returned to inform everyone that Madeliene  was safe, soundly sleeping in her bed, 5 minutes after Mathew  had claimed she was absent and missing!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5288 on: July 24, 2020, 09:43:AM »
Red flag (38) - a telltale sign that something was amiss with the accounts being given by various group members concerning their movements back and forth between their apartments and the tapas bar restuarant on that particular evening, and no proper explanation was given for why one of the 9 main meals cooked for the group in the restaurants kitchen had not been ate any time between 9.00pm and 10.00pm..
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 09:46:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5289 on: July 24, 2020, 10:12:AM »
Red flag (38) - ... no proper explanation was given for why one of the 9 main meals cooked for the group in the restaurants kitchen had not been ate any time between 9.00pm and 10.00pm..

Red flag (39) - Evening Dinner had been booked to start at 9pm, sharp. All 9 adult members of the group had attended the restuarant by start of the booking, and left at different times, 9.00pm (Mathew Oldfield), 9.05pm (Gerald McCann), 9.10pm (Jane Tanner), 9.20pm (Mathew  Oldfield and Russell O'Brien), 9.30pm (everyone), 9.45pm (everyone with the exception of Diane Webster), 10.00pm (Kate McCann  who left the tapas bar restaurant at that time, but who had returned and alerted everyone to the fact that Madeliene was missing from the McCann  apartment despite only Diane  Webster being present, and the absurd claim made by Kate McCann  that following on from this, all the other members of the group in attendance in the restuarant at that time (10.00pm) with the exception of Russell O'Brien  who had remained back in his apartment to look after his toddler  who was unwell, (only noticed after O'Brien had left the tapas bar restaurant  along with Mathew Oldfield earlier at 9.20pm), everyone else was present when Kate McCann returned from her check of 5A shortly after 10.00pm, and everyone then left the tapas bar, including Gerald McCann,  Jane Tanner, Diane Webster and Rachel  Mampilly, and hurried back to the McCann apartment, or their own apartments  - an event, or a number of individual events in this script which could not possibly be true!
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 10:45:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5290 on: July 24, 2020, 10:20:AM »
Red flag (40) - the deletion of phone call, and text messaging on Gerald McCanns mobile phone, between 9.00pm and 11.30pm, on the evening of 3rd May 2007, with no explanation offered saying why or who had been responsible for taking that action?

Somewhat rather compelling, as discovered by the Portuguese investigators, was that phone call records made to and from Gerald and Kate McCanns mobile phones remained in the memory of Kate McCanns seized mobile phone during the period her husband phone records had been deleted, during the evening of 3rd May 2007..
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 11:34:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5291 on: July 24, 2020, 10:32:AM »
Red flag (41) - the astonishing coincidence that phone or text messaging records in Robert Murats mobile phone had been deliberately deleted at 10.00pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, which as it turned out involved contact between Robert Murat and Serge Malinka, proven by phone records still inside Serge Malinkas mobile phone, when eventually seized by police and further, that computer hard drives  seized from Serge Malinkas home, had been cleaned, destroyed and wiped clean from the memory before police seized them suspicious activities linking Robert Murat, Serge Malinka and Gerald McCann together in an attempt to cover something sinister up involving contact with either one or another at critical times of the police investigation...
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 10:37:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5292 on: July 24, 2020, 10:43:AM »
Red flag (42) - mobile phone records recovered from a phone owned and used by  latest suspect, Christian B, showing that the suspect had been close to the McCann  apartment on the evening of 3rd May 2007, and in contact for an half hour period (call lasting between 7.32pm and 8.02pm) the other person being a restuarant owner 'Diago Silva'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5293 on: July 24, 2020, 11:19:AM »
Red flag (43) - in the same way, that Portuguese  investigators found phone record information in Kate McCanns mobile phones memory confirming that the deletion of phone records of the same calls, which were deleted from Gerald McCanns mobile phone memory refer Red flag (40) - a similar connection was found in the mobile phone memory belonging to Robert Murat made to Serge Malinka, at 10pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, ( by way of relying and using using geo location equipment) placed Robert Murat in the vicinity of the 'Baptista' supermarket downhill from the Ocean club complex..

When subsequently questioned about this phone record matter, he denied making such a call, stating that he must have accidentally touched the number in question and unknowingly activated a call to Malinka who was a business associate of his involved in the IT industry...   
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 11:25:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #5294 on: July 24, 2020, 11:33:AM »
Red flag (44) - Robert Murat made a living buying and selling properties, including the purchasing of derelict buildings. This is of particular interest to me insofar as, he inherited that line of business from his father who once owned the derelict building (5 Ave Dos Pescadores, Lagos..) located directly opposite the village church in Praia de Luz. This building was originally a bank, owned by his father  or a relative of his which has been passed down from relative or family member to another over the passing of time..

This is the derelict building and its rear garden  containing the only ever shallow grave found in Praia de luz, dug out inside a hollow at the rear left hand corner of the garden and its stone constructed sea wall. It was whilst I was examining the rear garden that I stumbled upon what I believed to be part of a human bone, which I took photographs of after I placed it on top of a flat surface of a sawn piece of tree trunk amongst heaps and heaps of piled high garden waste and rubbish. I took photographs of everything I touched or found, which was when I stumbled on what appeared to be a shallow grave in a hollow of the rear garden, that it struck me as being out of the ordinary simply because garden waste , logs and rubbish, etc, had carelessly been tossed lacksidaisically all over the place, which formed piles and piles of discarded waste. But the grave in the hollow puzzled me, as to why anybody would go to the trouble of burying something in a garden were everything else was heaped in piles above ground. Also laid close by to this shallow grave was a rusty iron bar (Jemmy) which led me to believe it had been used to prize up stones or rocks out of the ground beneath the surface of the grave to create sufficient space to conceal something of interest that whoever had dug out the grave did not want anyone to find easily. Also laid out in a sort of line which ran from close to the edge of the grave along a constructed stone wall which ran in a direction as though it was pointing towards the open sea beyond the gardens sea wall which itself ran parallel to the back edge of the garden. It struck me as odd that these large stones had been laid out as though it had some symbolic meaning. I took photographs of it all. At one point I made my way to where both of these walls met which perfectly was where the line of places stones terminated, or thereabouts, and took in the gaze beyond the sea wall, and it was then that I looked down only to see sea water splashing hard against rocks below. It was whilst I was gaping in awe of the magnificent views that my eyes fixed on what appeared to be a concrete ledge that ran parallel along the sea wall, from right to left, or left to right, and I saw a number of rusty and circular storm drain covers embedded in different places along the ledge. I decided that I would take a closer look at the ledge and these storm drain covers which were positioned in a somewhat precarious location for any human to attend without risk of falling to a possible death onto the rocks and into the angry tide of the sea...
« Last Edit: July 25, 2020, 01:22:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...