Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 876434 times)

0 Members and 37 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2910 on: September 16, 2017, 11:12:AM »
I don't see how after all these time Maddie could have been abducted and remain alive, unless she is being held captive in a dungeon somewhere. It's looking more likely in my opinion that she was taken by one man who lived nearby and was killed that same night. The libel laws prevent me from naming the man but I think most people will know to whom I'm alluding.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2911 on: September 16, 2017, 11:18:AM »
On a more serious note, I am more and more inclined to place more emphasis and importance on the sighting of the man carrying the child down a street in the general location of the sea shore, by the Smiths! This sighting interests me because of a number of reasons, one of which is that at the bottom of that particular street where the Smiths passed the man carrying the child is situated the resort Doctors surgery (LUZDOC). I know from personal experience that although the surgery closes early evening that there is always a notice providing an alternative phone number to be rung in any emergency, and I believe that if there had  been some sort of an accident involving Maddie that evening, that somebody carried her down toward the doctors surgery expecting to either get help in one way or another, but also and more probably if her condition had deteriorated beyond being helped, 'it gave the carrier of her body a good excuse to get almost down to the shoreline from apartment 5A without raising overt suspicion'. I think the man who carried Maddie down that stareet was either Gerry McCann, or one of the other male tapas group members. Alternatively, the man could have been someone who lived very close to the location of LUZDOC, again this affording that man a reasonable cover.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 11:21:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2912 on: September 16, 2017, 11:23:AM »
On a more serious note, I am more and more inclined to place more emphasis and importance on the sighting of the man carrying the child down a street in the general location of the sea shore, by the Smiths! This sighting interests me because of a number of reasons, one of which is that at the bottom of that particular street where the Smiths passed the man carrying the child is situated the resort Doctors surgery (LUZDOC). I know from personal experience that although the surgery closes early evening that there is always a notice providing an alternative phone number to be rung in any emergency, and I believe that if there had  been some sort of an accident involving Maddie that evening, that somebody carried her down toward the doctors surgery expecting to either get help in one way or another, but also and more probably if her condition had deteriorated beyond being helped, 'it gave the carrier of her body a good excuse to get almost down to the shoreline from apartment 5A without raising overt suspicion'. I think the man who carried Maddie down that stareet was either Gerry McCann, or one of the other male tapas group members. Alternatively, the man could have been someone who lived very close to the location of LUZDOC, again this affording that man a reasonable cover.
But what happened to the body? I can't imagine any of the Tapas 7 women covering up for any accident which may have befallen Maddie in the apartment.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2913 on: September 16, 2017, 11:28:AM »
I don't see how after all these time Maddie could have been abducted and remain alive, unless she is being held captive in a dungeon somewhere. It's looking more likely in my opinion that she was taken by one man who lived nearby and was killed that same night. The libel laws prevent me from naming the man but I think most people will know to whom I'm alluding.

One of the suspects, lived in an apartment close to the location of LUZDOC. Furthermore, the derelict building with what appears to be a shallow grave is situated across the road from the resorts church, and provided a secluded place in which to murder Madeleine McCann if she was taken alive from apartment 5A by a man, other than either Gerry McCann or one of the other male tapas group members! I do not think that the named suspect who was eventually cleared was the man the Smiths saw carrying the child who in all probability was and must have been the actual abductor! I think the vast majority of us know the identity of the person we are talking about...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2914 on: September 16, 2017, 12:04:PM »
But what happened to the body? I can't imagine any of the Tapas 7 women covering up for any accident which may have befallen Maddie in the apartment.

Lets exclude involvement of the parents and any tapas group member in the abduction and disappearence of Madeiline McCann. Lets say the abductor who carried her off, carried her off alive, either sleeping, or deliberately drugged. Lets call this man suspect (Y). Suspect 'Y' found a way to get into and out of apartment 5A, he had already selected his target! He may have already been inside apartment 5A on the evening prior to Maddie going missing, suspect 'Y' may have already sexually abused, or frightened the child in a bungled burgalry! This is possible in view of a report from other holiday makers or residents who told police that on the evening before the disappearence how they had heard the child constantly crying and calling out for her mother whilst the parents were wining and dining at the nearby tapas bar! On the following morning, Madeiline complained to her mother asking her why she hadn't returned the previous evening when she had been upset and crying? The mother has since questioned herself  for failing to ask Madeleine exactly what she meant? Now, lets assume, that suspect 'Y' had targeted Maddie, and had entered the apartment on the previous evening and that he was the cause of Madeleine McCanns upset on that occasion? He returned the following evening intending to remove her from apartment 5A, as part of a pre-arranged plan to abduct her, either for sexual gratification or possible sale for ready cash! This plan of abduction festered and grew towards fruition throughout the following day after the first contact with Maddie by suspect 'Y' the previous evening! If this was/is true, and suspect 'Y' is the local man we are talking about, he would have local knowlege, he would know a good place to conceal the childs body soon after he removed it from apartment 5A! He lived locally! His apartment was close to where the Smith contingent saw the mysterious man carrying the child, I think it is rather telling and extremely significant that situated at the bottom of that street, is the doctors surgery (LUZDOC). Suspect 'Y' would have used his knowlege of the streets to get him from apartment 5A toward his own apartment, or his pre-arranged hiding place near the sea shore, by using the cover of the location of LUZDOC to justify in the minds of anyone seeing him heading in that direction into thinking the child was unwell and he was seeking or intending to get medical help, available to him when the surgery was closed by way of the telephone number advertised for out of hours emergencies! To me, if the abductor (suspect 'Y') was/is the local man I am talking about, it would make sense for him to have gone into apartment 5A on the second occasion in posssession of a drug to prevent a repeat of the commotion that he created on the previous evening which led to upset and continuous crying by Madeleine McCann as a result of some abuse or other upon and against her in the absence of her parents. Use of a drug to subdue Maddie, by suspect 'Y' would also serve to give an impression to anyone seeing suspect 'Y' carrying her through the streets, that the child was either 'a sleep', or 'ill'...

Suspect 'Y' abducts the child, he drugs her, he carries her off, he uses part of his escape route to include the location of LUZDOC for obvious reasons. He lives close by to LUZDOC. He may also have prepared a hiding place after passing LUZDOC, other than taking her back to his apartment! That Hiding place seems so obvious to me to have been the derelict building across from the church! There was a single bed mattress! It was a derelict building! It was remote and offered protection from prying eyes! It had mounds of garden waste stacked up in the rear garden, and a hollow toward the back of the garden in question overshaddowed by tall reeds offering privacy from being seen by anyone in the surounding area! This was the most likliest location for suspect 'Y' to have taken the unconscious body of Madeleiene McCann! In the aforementioned hollow is situated a shallow looking grave surounded by marker stones. Clothing which arguably belonged to suspect 'Y' was found hidden inside the derelict building! No-one has searched this derelict building or excavated the shallow looking grave, and until they do it remains the most likeliest location where Madeleine McCanns remains and or her 'DNA' will eventually be found! The route taken by suspect 'Y' after the Smith sighting near LUZDOC is a simple and straight forward one, with access to the rear garden of the derelict building via a pub beer terrace, a pub which in all probabillity was suspect 'Y's local where he frequently drank...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 12:16:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2915 on: September 16, 2017, 12:58:PM »
'LUZDOC' building at end of street where the Smith Contingent saw suspect 'Y' carrying a child in his arms:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2916 on: September 16, 2017, 01:03:PM »
'LUZDOC' building on left showing view of street in which the Smith Contingent and suspect 'Y' carrying the child crossed paths...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2917 on: September 16, 2017, 01:08:PM »
Showing view looking downhill with 'LUZDOC' on right, and a further footpath along which the Smith contingent walked after leaving 'KELLYS BAR' and meeting suspect 'Y' carrying the child...

(1st image) The Smith contingent and suspect 'Y' who was carrying the child crossed paths above the postion shown by the parked car on the right as viewed...

(2nd image) at bottom of this footpath you turn right to head towards 'KELLYS BAR' and 'THE BULL' public house (the Smith contingent had left 'KELLYS BAR' and turned right up along this stretch of footpat, they didn't cross paths with suspect 'Y' on this footpath)..

(3rd image) shows a view with 'LUZDOC' on the left looking up the street, and the crossing of paths between the Smith contingent and suspect 'Y' carrying the child having occurred between the satelite dish and the street light on the right hand side of the road...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 01:41:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2918 on: September 16, 2017, 01:24:PM »
Showing view at junction where 'LUZDOC' and the passageway is located (a head), with alternative route towards sea shown on left...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2919 on: September 16, 2017, 01:25:PM »
Suspect 'Y' lived in an apartment closeby, the above location..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2920 on: September 16, 2017, 01:27:PM »
The derelict building where it is believed he took Madeleine McCann on the evening of her disappearence is but a stones throw away from 'LUZDOC'...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 01:29:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2921 on: September 16, 2017, 01:31:PM »
Access to the rear garden of the derelict building via the beer terrace of THE BULL public house is but a stones throw away from 'LUZDOC', and the derelict building. 'THE BULL' public house is positioned on far left in this image. Its beer teerace is beyond the far corner of the building. 'KELLYS BAR' is situated out of sight (far right), again, a stones throw away from the prime site (rear garden of derelect building) where I believe the remains of Madeleine McCann may be found...

(2nd image) Showing view of the beer terrace on the right hand side of 'THE BULL' public house via which suspect 'Y' could have gained access to the rear garden of the derelict building on the evening he abducted Madeleine McCann..

(3rd image) Situated behind 'THE BULL' public house is the rear garden of the derelict building, where there exists a shallow grave in a hollow at the rear left hand corner obscruded by tall reeds...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 02:06:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2922 on: September 16, 2017, 01:49:PM »
 (1st image) View showing close proximity of 'derelict building' (bottom left) and 'THE BULL' public house (top left)..

(2nd image) Showing view down toward sea shore with location of derelict building at left middle..

(3rd imge) showing derelict building on left whilst looking up hill from direction of sea, with church out of shot on right...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 01:58:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2923 on: September 16, 2017, 02:11:PM »
Close proximity of location where the Smith contigent saw suspect 'Y' carry a child, 'LUZDOC', 'THE BULL' public house, and the derelict building, where it is strohngly suspected the remains of Madeleine McCann may be found...
« Last Edit: September 16, 2017, 02:32:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2924 on: September 16, 2017, 03:47:PM »
I am now proceeding on the basis that the McCann parents are/were totally innocent of any involvement in the disappearence of thier daughter, Madeleine...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...