Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891880 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2130 on: October 28, 2013, 10:05:PM »
Yeah, she would stand up for me right until the day she passed away, god rest her soul, it would have been her 86th birthday, today - "Happy Birthday, Mum"...

That´s a real mum! Congrats with her! My mother has her flaws for sure (and so do I), but she will ALWAYS stand up for me no matter what!

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2131 on: October 28, 2013, 10:10:PM »
That´s a real mum! Congrats with her! My mother has her flaws for sure (and so do I), but she will ALWAYS stand up for me no matter what!

Thanks, for saying so, Alias...

-Mums the word-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
« Last Edit: October 28, 2013, 11:06:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2133 on: October 29, 2013, 05:39:AM »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2134 on: October 29, 2013, 05:51:AM »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2135 on: October 29, 2013, 08:52:PM »
what was murrets relationship with malinka.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2136 on: October 29, 2013, 09:07:PM »
what was murrets relationship with malinka.





Strictly professional,,whatever that meant,Mike. Both into porn. Malinka was a skipper of a pleasure boat.Symington is Murats' cousin who has a boat and exports wine. All 3 look alike in sunglasses.
Their " friendship " was never questioned so far as I was aware.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2137 on: October 29, 2013, 09:20:PM »




Strictly professional,,whatever that meant,Mike. Both into porn. Malinka was a skipper of a pleasure boat.Symington is Murats' cousin who has a boat and exports wine. All 3 look alike in sunglasses.
Their " friendship " was never questioned so far as I was aware.




Malinka,Murat and Matt Fazackerley were possibly business partners.Again,all 3 look the same,weird.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2138 on: October 29, 2013, 10:00:PM »



Malinka,Murat and Matt Fazackerley were possibly business partners.Again,all 3 look the same,weird.
Malinka and Fazackerley ran computer shops together. Malinka is linked to Murat,Murat has been linked to GM and Fazackerley is linked to Leicestershire where the McCanns live. All very suspect!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2139 on: October 29, 2013, 10:10:PM »
Malinka and Fazackerley ran computer shops together. Malinka is linked to Murat,Murat has been linked to GM and Fazackerley is linked to Leicestershire where the McCanns live. All very suspect!




I'll say,tyler.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2140 on: October 29, 2013, 10:56:PM »
how is murret linked to gm.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2141 on: October 29, 2013, 11:33:PM »
New time-line of events:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2142 on: October 30, 2013, 03:44:PM »
How unfortunate is this.? One of the " main " suspects involved in the disappearance of Madeleine,,,died after an accident in 2009. He was a worker at the complex,but there was some sort of a disagreement which took place and the guy left. It was thought that after he left his employment,he took revenge by taking Madeleine,,and if this is/was the case,and if a sex attack took place,,then he'll have killed the child.
I'm trying to think back now to 2007 and an argument taking place,,as I remember at the time,,quite a few staff had either left,,or were leaving,,or being transferred elsewhere. PJ's hadn't interviewed the said member of staff,,because he wasn't around at the time.
This isn't very good news at all,,as police will be now concentrating on looking for a childs' body.
One thing,,if gypsies had taken the girl,,,she'd still be alive.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2143 on: October 30, 2013, 04:47:PM »
I am still interested in why Kate McCANN told a social worker that Mad's had been taken by a couple, as if she knew more about what had actually taken place...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2144 on: October 30, 2013, 04:55:PM »
I am still interested in why Kate McCANN told a social worker that Mad's had been taken by a couple, as if she knew more about what had actually taken place...





Mike,,being in a state of shock,,maybe Kate had a " couple " in mind,,possibly thinking that abductors,etc work in twos. I don't think she had anyone specific in her mind at that stage. It would have been twisted if she'd said " he took her,or she took her ". The mind works overtime looking to blame someone.It's human nature.