Roch/All :0
I suppose we all have different opinions on this case and its a matter of what you believe happened on the night Madeline disappeared. Like in the Bamber case we have to look at the evidence in what was provided to us.
The first thing is that from the onset the crime scene was not cordoned off. The reason for this is because the police sent traffic cops to apartment 5A and they had no idea how to handle a crime scene. The PJ did not turn up till the following morning in the early hours. This meant that any forensic evidence gained from the apartment was minimal.
The dogs played a key part in tracing blood and cadaver, but this is inadmissible in a British court. Simply because its unsafe to convict on a dog bark alone....It would be ridiculous to do so. The fact that our own police have dismissed this evidence, or should I say don't play on this evidence, tells me that its not that significant in finding out what happened to Madeline.
The key evidence in this case is the Smith's evidence which might feature on tonight's program. Here we have several adults seeing a man carrying a child, a man that has never come forward despite world wide coverage of the case. Timing is important and its important to remember that when the Smith's saw this man both Madeline's parents were in the apartment.
I think the hype of tonight's crimewatch is to attract as many viewer's as possible. Tomorrow it will be shown in Holland and on Wednesday Germany.
I have faith in what Scotland Yard are up to, because I feel the whole investigation from the beginning was poor. Its not about money its about a little girl that is missing from her family.
