Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 585621 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1350 on: April 15, 2013, 12:34:PM »
i heard gonka amoral was heavly in debt at the time does anyone know wether this is true or not.



It was true,nugs. Him and his wife were on the verge of losing their home. He had to sell his " prized car " in order to keep the cash flowing,,,then it was decided that he claw back some cash by writing a book,,namely " The Truth of the Lie ".
This was a man who ran to the press on the morning of the abduction,,and blatantly said that the McCanns had disposed of the childs' body,so the newspaper,24Horas,printed this and it caught on world-wide with the press.
To cut a long story short,the McCanns took him to court for a libel case,,and won,,so what money he'd built up with the sale of his book,he had to forfeit after the case.
All finances were then put into the fund set up for Madeleine. 

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1351 on: April 15, 2013, 01:12:PM »
so if someone had paid him not to look in there direction i am sure he would of only been to happy to oblige.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1352 on: April 15, 2013, 02:57:PM »
so if someone had paid him not to look in there direction i am sure he would of only been to happy to oblige.



That about sums him up,nugs. The man was heavily in debt. In fact,,another point that wasn't played-on so much was a sum of money that changed hands between the police on the morning of the investigation. Which ended up in an officers account which seemingly " he knew nothing about ".!
Neither do we.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1353 on: April 15, 2013, 03:34:PM »
i bet this also has something to do with the other case amoral was involved in.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1354 on: April 15, 2013, 03:41:PM »
i bet this also has something to do with the other case amoral was involved in.


I'm almost certain it did nugs. The beating up of that poor woman who was also accused of murdering her daughter. Bearing that in mind,,it's of no surprise to see how the McCann case went.
The police are corrupt,nugs. Strange how Amaral was " thrown " off the case in the following October of that year,2007,,then " thrown " out of the force,,a disgraced man.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1355 on: April 15, 2013, 03:44:PM »
so actully no real mystry russian pervert aducts childs burns his car to cover it up wipes his hard drive then bribes the police to look elsewhere.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1356 on: April 15, 2013, 05:35:PM »
so actully no real mystry russian pervert aducts childs burns his car to cover it up wipes his hard drive then bribes the police to look elsewhere.

Hi Nugs :)

We don't know that for sure.  What is fact is that Malinka claimed he knew nothing about Madeleine's disappearance till the following day. 

Because the PJ looked into Murat's phone records they noted a call to Malinka on the night Madeleine disappeared.  So the PJ interviewed him.  Its sad to say but the police found bastility and porn on his computer and he did wipe one of his hard drives clean prior to the interview.  His car was burned in 2008 the following year with the words FALA wrote in red on the pavement. Fala means talk!. 

Malinka worked with a Matt F for two years running a computer business and Matt's girlfriend says the reason they split up and the business folded was because Malinka was taking money.  She goes on the say that Malinka often bragged about having young girls and told them he was once caught with a 14 year old, by the childs father....He was also knocking off a 32/33 year old woman, who had a daughter aged 16 and he told them he was going to eat her as well as the mother. 

He also had several European passports and many aliases....The man himself was well dodgy, but this does not mean he is a killer....

Last night Lookout and I found more things out about the past of Murat, but I don't think we will be able to post it on here......Right must get some tea... :D :D :D :D :D

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1357 on: April 15, 2013, 05:40:PM »
no it doesnt make him a killer on its own i bet he knows what happened to her though.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1358 on: April 15, 2013, 06:49:PM »
no it doesnt make him a killer on its own i bet he knows what happened to her though.

No it doesn't and we must be careful not to accuse....There are many suspects in this case, there is a list as long as my arm.

The PJ brought all these people to the forefront, but I bet diamonds that none of them are guilty and the one that is has gotten away.... :-\ ;) ;) ;)

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1359 on: April 15, 2013, 06:58:PM »
money starts appearing in the bank accounts of police officers.

this is more than just a lone abduction.

assumeing the money had anything to do with this case but its a funny coincidence.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1360 on: April 15, 2013, 07:08:PM »
money starts appearing in the bank accounts of police officers.

this is more than just a lone abduction.

assumeing the money had anything to do with this case but its a funny coincidence.

Lookout is right about Amaral being on the brink of bankruptcy! If you look at the early photo's of Amaral you will see he improves from a greasy man, to a man with a look of status! The change of image came when the book was published.

When Madeleine went missing he was dining with friends and did not turn up till the following morning. All this hype about him being in charge, he in charge of his wine glass...

The two copper that turned up were from the GNR they were road cops! They had not got a clue how to handle a crime scene or make any major decisions on preserving a crime scene.  By the time forensics arrived the crime scene proved to be none existent...there was nothing to be had.  They even had to cope with dog hairs all over the place...The vast amount of hair found made it impossible to determine any vital evidence which could have been vital to the case.  :-\ :) :) :) :)


Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1361 on: April 15, 2013, 07:12:PM »
now murat phoning malinka that night nothing really suspicious about that if Murat regularly phoned him but did regularly phone him.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1362 on: April 15, 2013, 07:19:PM »
now murat phoning malinka that night nothing really suspicious about that if Murat regularly phoned him but did regularly phone him.

I think the thing was that Malinka denied having a conversation with Murat....Of course he could have forgot...2 weeks later this sort of thing does happen..

I don't think that Murat was happy with the website that Malinka had designed for him, he kept wanting Malinka to make some changes...

Nugs what do you think about this case...Do you think that any of the suspects we have discussed on here is a likely candidate for the abduction of Madeleine? 

Gawd! the more I try to find the more I find out...especially since the case files were made public in 2008...
 :) :) :) :) :)

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1363 on: April 15, 2013, 08:44:PM »
i dont think ethere murret or malinka actually took her but i think they both know more than there telling.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #1364 on: April 15, 2013, 08:48:PM »
did muret phone malinkas landline or his mobile.