Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891436 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Curiosity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6015 on: May 12, 2025, 06:35:PM »
If he's so good at covering his tracks why keep all the trophies?
Errmm, because he was a hoarder, thinking he was too clever and proficient at his chosen trade for the lackadaisical PJ to ever feel his collar.
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6016 on: May 12, 2025, 06:50:PM »
Errmm, because he was a hoarder, thinking he was too clever and proficient at his chosen trade for the lackadaisical PJ to ever feel his collar.
So he keeps trophies of multiple victims, yet there's no link to Madeleine: no photograph taken after May 3, none of Madeleine's clothing, no DNA, no body.

Offline Curiosity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6017 on: May 12, 2025, 07:29:PM »
So he keeps trophies of multiple victims, yet there's no link to Madeleine: no photograph taken after May 3, none of Madeleine's clothing, no DNA, no body.
We've no idea what the BKA have on him, they could be still sifting through and analyzing his possessions, hard drives and documents. Why do you place so much store on Pat Brown and what's your opinion of her tenuous theory about what happened to Madeleine after the Smithman/Gerry sighting?
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6018 on: May 12, 2025, 08:11:PM »
We've no idea what the BKA have on him, they could be still sifting through and analyzing his possessions, hard drives and documents. Why do you place so much store on Pat Brown and what's your opinion of her tenuous theory about what happened to Madeleine after the Smithman/Gerry sighting?
Well, I do tend to believe Madeleine died in the apartment. It's not such as outlandish theory really, having been propounded by the guy in charge initially, Goncalo Amoral.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6019 on: June 02, 2025, 08:13:PM »
Police will dig in an attempt to unearth Madeleine's body: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y8jmkr3j7o

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6020 on: June 03, 2025, 10:16:PM »
How long have they been trying to pin it on him? It's like if they throw enough mud at him it will stick, after the case is discontinued.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6021 on: June 03, 2025, 11:07:PM »
How long have they been trying to pin it on him? It's like if they throw enough mud at him it will stick, after the case is discontinued.
Even if they find the body, can they link it to Christian Brückner? https://youtu.be/hmnwZWzs5Fg

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6022 on: June 04, 2025, 08:04:AM »
I've just noticed this at the end of a Sky News article.

Offline Curiosity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6023 on: June 04, 2025, 08:20:AM »
I've just noticed this at the end of a Sky News article.
They're searching for the nucleus of an iron atom on the point of a needle in a haystack.
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6024 on: June 04, 2025, 03:19:PM »
They're searching for the nucleus of an iron atom on the point of a needle in a haystack.

What's your opinion.. do you think it's CB or do you harbor any suspicions regarding parents and the 2 X different dog  alerts for apartment and car?

Offline Curiosity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6025 on: June 04, 2025, 07:17:PM »
What's your opinion.. do you think it's CB or do you harbor any suspicions regarding parents and the 2 X different dog  alerts for apartment and car?
I've no faith in dog alerts after cadaver sniffer Eddie alerted to 'remains' below a layer of concrete in the Jersey Children's Home investigation (2007-9). Underneath they only found a piece of 'bone' resembling part of a human skull which after scientific examination and analysis turned out to be nothing more than a coconut shell fragment. That and the fact his handler Martin Grime was paid the outrageous amount of £93,000 for his services and found little if anything of any evidential value -

A leaked report by financial auditors into the investigation shows Grime received £750 a day for the first seven days’ work his dog did and £650 a day for 136 days thereafter.

"I don't believe a dog can pick up such a scent through a layer of concrete," said Mike Swindells, a former Lancashire officer who wrote the standard sniffer dog training manual."

"It's really very unlikely."


As for the two sniffers employed in 5A, they might have alerted to faint traces of previous occupants and there was a rumour that Grime prompted them to indicate at the McCann's hired Renault Scenic because there was a 'Look for Madeleine' poster in its rear side window (removed by The Sun for an edited later recording), whereas there were none in other cars involved in the trial. In addition, the Scenic must have been driven and used by many other people before the McCanns, so the dogs could have alerted to blood/trace odours left by them.

In a report filed by UK police expert Mark Harrison after the search, he wrote: "No inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence."

I think the BKA are on the right track. They must have something more on Brueckner which the world isn't privy to as yet for them to spend their own resources and time trying to nail him. Resident in PdL May 2007, prolific burglar, convicted drug dealer, sadistic rapist both proved (Menkes) and alleged (Behan), actual child abuser from youth, exhibitionist, internet paedophilia chat room participant, collector of child abuse images on hard drives, sd cards and USB sticks - he's quite capable of abducting a 4 year old for nefarious purposes then callously killing and disposing of her body.

As for Pat Brown, she's just got a beef against the McCanns, Gerry in particular, for Amazon book removal reasons mentioned before, which is clouding her judgement and allowing/encouraging countless trolls to litter her video comments section with McCann abuse.
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6026 on: June 04, 2025, 08:17:PM »
I've no faith in dog alerts after cadaver sniffer Eddie alerted to 'remains' below a layer of concrete in the Jersey Children's Home investigation (2007-9). Underneath they only found a piece of 'bone' resembling part of a human skull which after scientific examination and analysis turned out to be nothing more than a coconut shell fragment. That and the fact his handler Martin Grime was paid the outrageous amount of £93,000 for his services and found little if anything of any evidential value -

A leaked report by financial auditors into the investigation shows Grime received £750 a day for the first seven days’ work his dog did and £650 a day for 136 days thereafter.

"I don't believe a dog can pick up such a scent through a layer of concrete," said Mike Swindells, a former Lancashire officer who wrote the standard sniffer dog training manual."

"It's really very unlikely."


As for the two sniffers employed in 5A, they might have alerted to faint traces of previous occupants and there was a rumour that Grime prompted them to indicate at the McCann's hired Renault Scenic because there was a 'Look for Madeleine' poster in its rear side window (removed by The Sun for an edited later recording), whereas there were none in other cars involved in the trial. In addition, the Scenic must have been driven and used by many other people before the McCanns, so the dogs could have alerted to blood/trace odours left by them.

In a report filed by UK police expert Mark Harrison after the search, he wrote: "No inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence."

I think the BKA are on the right track. They must have something more on Brueckner which the world isn't privy to as yet for them to spend their own resources and time trying to nail him. Resident in PdL May 2007, prolific burglar, convicted drug dealer, sadistic rapist both proved (Menkes) and alleged (Behan), actual child abuser from youth, exhibitionist, internet paedophilia chat room participant, collector of child abuse images on hard drives, sd cards and USB sticks - he's quite capable of abducting a 4 year old for nefarious purposes then callously killing and disposing of her body.

As for Pat Brown, she's just got a beef against the McCanns, Gerry in particular, for Amazon book removal reasons mentioned before, which is clouding her judgement and allowing/encouraging countless trolls to litter her video comments section with McCann abuse.

Thank you that was a good read.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6027 on: June 04, 2025, 10:40:PM »
I've no faith in dog alerts after cadaver sniffer Eddie alerted to 'remains' below a layer of concrete in the Jersey Children's Home investigation (2007-9). Underneath they only found a piece of 'bone' resembling part of a human skull which after scientific examination and analysis turned out to be nothing more than a coconut shell fragment. That and the fact his handler Martin Grime was paid the outrageous amount of £93,000 for his services and found little if anything of any evidential value -

A leaked report by financial auditors into the investigation shows Grime received £750 a day for the first seven days’ work his dog did and £650 a day for 136 days thereafter.

"I don't believe a dog can pick up such a scent through a layer of concrete," said Mike Swindells, a former Lancashire officer who wrote the standard sniffer dog training manual."

"It's really very unlikely."


As for the two sniffers employed in 5A, they might have alerted to faint traces of previous occupants and there was a rumour that Grime prompted them to indicate at the McCann's hired Renault Scenic because there was a 'Look for Madeleine' poster in its rear side window (removed by The Sun for an edited later recording), whereas there were none in other cars involved in the trial. In addition, the Scenic must have been driven and used by many other people before the McCanns, so the dogs could have alerted to blood/trace odours left by them.

In a report filed by UK police expert Mark Harrison after the search, he wrote: "No inference can be drawn as to whether a human cadaver has previously been in any location without other supporting physical evidence."

I think the BKA are on the right track. They must have something more on Brueckner which the world isn't privy to as yet for them to spend their own resources and time trying to nail him. Resident in PdL May 2007, prolific burglar, convicted drug dealer, sadistic rapist both proved (Menkes) and alleged (Behan), actual child abuser from youth, exhibitionist, internet paedophilia chat room participant, collector of child abuse images on hard drives, sd cards and USB sticks - he's quite capable of abducting a 4 year old for nefarious purposes then callously killing and disposing of her body.

As for Pat Brown, she's just got a beef against the McCanns, Gerry in particular, for Amazon book removal reasons mentioned before, which is clouding her judgement and allowing/encouraging countless trolls to litter her video comments section with McCann abuse.
Pat Brown is a criminal profiler. She's not a sensationalist, and if you watch her videos she follows the evidence.

To redress the balance a little: https://youtu.be/RdY0y7Vk77o

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6546
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6028 on: June 08, 2025, 08:15:PM »
Pat Brown is a criminal profiler. She's not a sensationalist, and if you watch her videos she follows the evidence.

To redress the balance a little: https://youtu.be/RdY0y7Vk77o

I have never rated the woman.  She is completely wrong with regards to the McCanns.  Which cases has she been involved in where her input has been pivotal to the outcome?
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #6029 on: June 08, 2025, 08:45:PM »
I have never rated the woman.  She is completely wrong with regards to the McCanns.  Which cases has she been involved in where her input has been pivotal to the outcome?
Well, I don't know whether it was pivotal, but she claims to have been called in numerous times by police to establish a profile of an offender. As I say, she is a criminal profiler, not a Miss Marple whodunnit character.

A race against time..https://youtu.be/DmuzDHf9Xzo