new member

[Stephanie]

You posted to me on a post over two years old.  I responded.  I have no need to pm you. I have nothing personal to say to you or to this forum.

As to how ill I have been why would I need your sympathy? I am not about to discuss my illness on here or in PM for that matter.

I genuinely wish you well in your life. You can believe that or not.   I have no more to say.

Good to hear your illness hasn't affected your memory!

But since you don't know me, why would you be singling me out, wishing me well and peace and love and all that cobblers, and no one else?

Why are you 'genuinely' wishing me well in my life now? I find that a very odd comment to make. If you were a genuinely nice person, wouldn't you always wish someone well? Did it take your alleged 'serious illness' to see the light?

Hope I'm not keeping you from your slumber.

Peace, love and light, live long and prosper and all that Michaela. TA TA for now!

[Michaela]

I did not single you out. YOU posted asking ME a question.

Stop this harrassment.

[Stephanie]

I did not single you out. YOU posted asking ME a question.

Stop this harrassment.

How am I harassing you?

I am merely responding to YOUR posts on a forum that is for members only. YOU choose to be here! And YOU said when you joined the forum you were interested in alleged cases of miscarriages of justice!

You also posted a lot of questions about the case I was once involved with and referred to me by name.

There is a very simple solution Michaela, ignore my posts.

If I didn't know better I'd think from your reply you're showing your true colours...

Either you are wishing me well or you are suggesting I'm harassing you? Which one is it?

[Stephanie]

You posted to me on a post over two years old.  I responded.  I have no need to pm you. I have nothing personal to say to you or to this forum.

As to how ill I have been why would I need your sympathy? I am not about to discuss my illness on here or in PM for that matter.

I genuinely wish you well in your life. You can believe that or not.   I have no more to say.

I responded to a post where you alluded to me being a liar! I could have started a new thread to clear your questions up.

I presented you with evidence, at the very least you could have the good grace to apologise for suggesting such a thing, however long ago it was

It's against forum rules to call someone a liar apparently so I think I'm going to report your post and request you are given a warning for your behaviour.

[Michaela]

God Bless you. I still wish you well and hope your future is full of love and happiness.

good night. I am going back to bed.

[lookout]

Well that was a good start. No wonder nobody posts.

[Stephanie]

Well that was a good start. No wonder nobody posts.

A good start to what Lookout? Your post makes no sense?

[Stephanie]

God Bless you. I still wish you well and hope your future is full of love and happiness.

good night. I am going back to bed.

But you still can't find the courage to apologise?

[Stephanie]

Hi Michaela - I've found some old screen shots dating back to early 2013 with many posts from you about the authenticity of blogs written by SH. Here are a couple of your posts. You actually made many posts on the issue.....



"I asked if there was proof that Simon Hall actually wrote these blogs. I have not had an answer to this simple question.
Most people in prison suffering a MOJ like to get their voice heard to their supporters and media.
This point of view/opinion is usually scanned and retyped so people can see it is word for word what the prisoner says.
Not in this case it is not
Nor can Mrs Hall confirm that these are the exact words of her husband or show us anything in his own handwriting.
Why is this?
She will not tell us the answer. So in that case I would disregard everything posted in Simon Halls name because there is no proof."



"Oh I support your husbands cause but I do not support what he is allegedly saying I say allegedly because there is NO PROOF he is actually writing what you say he is
So what you are saying is you cannot tell us you sat and typed out letters from your husband.
You cannot show proof that he actually said what you state he said.
As for a book I assume you mean regarding your husbands story IF and that is a big IF he is declared innocent. Do you really think this book if it ever happens will be about you and all you imagine?
However getting your husband out is the main thing will he be out on parole on life licence or his name cleared I wonder?"


"I am going to go to bed soon but I will be back tomorrow. The question will remain the same, where is the proof that Simon Hall wrote these blogs?
That seems to be a very difficult question to answer for his wife
Why it should be difficult one will never know.
You would assume when someone is bad mouthing his family it would be written down so it could not be denied or misinterpreted.
I would also imagine that someone who writes like this would have the guts to have it hand written so it could be scanned to show the family in private!
In fact, I would imagine if someone REALLY felt like this they would write directly to the people.
But these people appear to love him no matter what he does. And like all parents, they will forgive him.
The question is still the same though!!!
But it clear to me there is no proof!!"

[Stephanie]

Hi Michaela - I've found some old screen shots dating back to early 2013 with many posts from you about the authenticity of blogs written by SH. Here are a couple of your posts. You actually made many posts on the issue.

SH dictated his blogs over the phone to me. I couldn't post that fact at the time because the prison had already spoken to him about this and I didn't want to get him in trouble (he tells the CCRC representatives this in interview if you recall).

Maybe he did it this way so that people like you would question their authenticity and 'hound me,' taking the heat off of him?

But I agree with you now, his blogs didn't help his cause.

At the time, I thought he'd finally found the courage to speak up for himself instead of 'doing things for appearances sake?!'

'The family' had done nothing whatsoever to support him or his cause for as long as I can remember - many years....

He did write other things to his family 'in private' around the same time. His adoptive father apparently intercepted the communication to ensure it wasn't seen by his adoptive mother - I was called "an evil bitch" by the father for allowing it?

And you may have seen the way other family members of his behaved around that time?

The truth was starting to come out IMO..... With hindsight... 

[Stephanie]

She will not tell us the answer. So in that case I would disregard everything posted in Simon Halls name because there is no proof."

"Oh I support your husbands cause but I do not support what he is allegedly saying I say allegedly because there is NO PROOF he is actually writing what you say he is

As for a book I assume you mean regarding your husbands story IF and that is a big IF he is declared innocent. Do you really think this book if it ever happens will be about you and all you imagine?
However getting your husband out is the main thing will he be out on parole on life licence or his name cleared I wonder?"


"That seems to be a very difficult question to answer for his wife
Why it should be difficult one will never know.
You would assume when someone is bad mouthing his family it would be written down so it could not be denied or misinterpreted.
I would also imagine that someone who writes like this would have the guts to have it hand written so it could be scanned to show the family in private!
In fact, I would imagine if someone REALLY felt like this they would write directly to the people.
But these people appear to love him no matter what he does. And like all parents, they will forgive him.
The question is still the same though!!!
But it clear to me there is no proof!!"
[/i]

You see Michaela, call me paranoid, but by the way you posted back in 2013 - not only do you appear to contradict yourself - what you write is similar to another poster?

I've cut your posts down a little to highlight the ones that stand out...

Can you clarify please?

[Stephanie]

See Michaela you appeared to know something the rest of us didn't know?

There are clues in the way you write.

This thread has had 1659 views - now I wonder why that would be?

[Stephanie]

Hi Michaela, me again - just found another screenshot of one of your posts dated the 6th Feb 2013.

"Standing by your husband is all well and good and to be admired.

Do you realise the damage these blogs are doing to his case? Yes people are reading them because it is like car crash TV.

I cannot believe what I am reading in relation to this case.

This has to STOP! your husband said in one of the blogs that if people want to talk about anyone talk about him and the case. This is not happening.

I am sorry but these blogs do not talk about the case. They make him look bad. If you love your husband like you say you do, then you should pull these blogs right off the net. 

Your husbands situation is that if this continues he will be sent back to a higher cat prison because of these blogs and their revelations.

What should be discussed is the evidence not all this nonsense."




Btw, I did read these to SH, it wasn't easy keeping him updated with all the 'goings on' over the internet back then, but he was kept well briefed.

Much of the time when I posted on this forum, he and I were talking to one another on the phone.

We would speak sometimes up to 11 hours a day.

In fact he would often dictate my responses to posts on this forum and I would post the replies word for word.

Prison phone calls are recorded, did you know that?

[Stephanie]

I've found yet more screen shots of posts you made Michaela and there are a couple of points I would like to question you on - I've highlighted them in bold.....

You wrote these in Feb 2013 - not long before Simon overdosed and ended up in hospital.......





"What is more terrible is that you are allowing someone who is in prison without full access to what is happening online, to tell write to you and ask you to post what has been posted.

I cannot say strongly enough that this stuff being posted is DAMAGING TO SIMON. and you posting it on his behalf are helping to damage him further. I cannot be any straighter in what I say.

Is Simon aware of everything posted? I mean do you send him EXACT copies of everything?

If you really love him stop him from doing this. It is not helping and thats the Gods honest truth"




"I think you will find it is more than half a dozen people who feel the same way.

I am interested in the truth. Very Interested in it, which is why I asked YOU a question but sadly you cannot answer an easy question. Your evasiveness does nothing to help.

Some of the words may very well be true. I say SOME not all! But I am struggling very hard to understand why, IF and that is a big IF, Simon did write these words, why he would allow it to go public. It does nothing to put Simon in a sympathetic light at all. Though you fail to realise this.

Why would I want to go to all the effort of writing to Simon to ask him a question that you can answer because you are the one who put the information into the public domain?

Surely you must know if Simon sent you letters with these exact words on them for you to type up? Why is that so hard for you to answer?"




"You are the one playing games with a man's life for who knows what reason.

The damage done to this man's credibility and his future is terrible.

You will have to deal with this when he is finally released and I do not think his reaction will be what you think it will be, once he see's everything with his own eyes."




"You are avoiding answering a question ONLY YOU can answer.

Of course sympathy will not get Simon out of prison. Neither will your blogs achieve this. In fact they could have the opposite affect on a parole hearing. But carry on and keep damaging the man you say you love.

So there is a follow up blog coming up? WOW that was quick! I mean how long does it take a blog take to write then mail out to you from prison?  mmmmm interesting and raises more questions of the validity of these blogs.

Perhaps if Simon really wants to write blogs he should have his actual letters scanned and put online, that way there would be no doubt who wrote them and whose words they are.

Do I know Simon?  Yes actually I do. Which is why I am questioning the validity of these blogs."




"Carry on blogging till your heart is content! Give the CPS and whoever else more ammunition to use against Simon. It will all be on your head!

Simon is in prison because he was convicted of murder.  He is not in prison because he may or may not get on with his family. 

One thing to remember blood really is thicker than water and family ties are a lot stronger than you may think. and yes I realise he has adoptive parents!

Why do you always fall out with people who disagree with you or ask you questions?

I want justice for Simon Hall and anyone who is in prison wrongfully convicted. None of this is helping Simon. You have to take your share of the blame for this and get back on track.
That was some free friendly advice."

[Stephanie]

I've found yet more screen shots of posts you made Michaela and there are a couple of points I would like to question you on - I've highlighted them in bold.....

You wrote these in Feb 2013 - not long before Simon overdosed and ended up in hospital.......





"What is more terrible is that you are allowing someone who is in prison without full access to what is happening online, to tell write to you and ask you to post what has been posted.

I cannot say strongly enough that this stuff being posted is DAMAGING TO SIMON. and you posting it on his behalf are helping to damage him further. I cannot be any straighter in what I say.

Is Simon aware of everything posted? I mean do you send him EXACT copies of everything?

If you really love him stop him from doing this. It is not helping and thats the Gods honest truth"




"I think you will find it is more than half a dozen people who feel the same way.

I am interested in the truth. Very Interested in it, which is why I asked YOU a question but sadly you cannot answer an easy question. Your evasiveness does nothing to help.

Some of the words may very well be true. I say SOME not all! But I am struggling very hard to understand why, IF and that is a big IF, Simon did write these words, why he would allow it to go public. It does nothing to put Simon in a sympathetic light at all. Though you fail to realise this.

Why would I want to go to all the effort of writing to Simon to ask him a question that you can answer because you are the one who put the information into the public domain?

Surely you must know if Simon sent you letters with these exact words on them for you to type up? Why is that so hard for you to answer?"




"You are the one playing games with a man's life for who knows what reason.

The damage done to this man's credibility and his future is terrible.

You will have to deal with this when he is finally released and I do not think his reaction will be what you think it will be, once he see's everything with his own eyes."




"You are avoiding answering a question ONLY YOU can answer.

Of course sympathy will not get Simon out of prison. Neither will your blogs achieve this. In fact they could have the opposite affect on a parole hearing. But carry on and keep damaging the man you say you love.

So there is a follow up blog coming up? WOW that was quick! I mean how long does it take a blog take to write then mail out to you from prison?  mmmmm interesting and raises more questions of the validity of these blogs.

Perhaps if Simon really wants to write blogs he should have his actual letters scanned and put online, that way there would be no doubt who wrote them and whose words they are.

Do I know Simon?  Yes actually I do. Which is why I am questioning the validity of these blogs."




"Carry on blogging till your heart is content! Give the CPS and whoever else more ammunition to use against Simon. It will all be on your head!

Simon is in prison because he was convicted of murder.  He is not in prison because he may or may not get on with his family. 

One thing to remember blood really is thicker than water and family ties are a lot stronger than you may think. and yes I realise he has adoptive parents!

Why do you always fall out with people who disagree with you or ask you questions?

I want justice for Simon Hall and anyone who is in prison wrongfully convicted. None of this is helping Simon. You have to take your share of the blame for this and get back on track.
That was some free friendly advice."

What is it you posted to me? Oh that's right 'God Bless you. I still wish you well and hope your future is full of love and happiness.'

Same to you 'Michaela'