« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement  (Read 3951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

-Harters-

  • Guest
2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« on: January 08, 2013, 12:28:PM »
The text is I believe already on the forum, but here is the original document if anybody is interested.  :-\

« Last Edit: January 08, 2013, 12:37:PM by Yeltrah »
Logged

Offline boheme

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 264
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2013, 02:57:PM »
Quote from: Yeltrah on January 08, 2013, 12:28:PM
The text is I believe already on the forum, but here is the original document if anybody is interested.  :-\

Interesting to read, thanks for posting...
Logged

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2013, 03:55:PM »
Thank you Hartley.
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2013, 05:25:PM »
Thanks, Hartley. 12. Is very interesting. Will print this off to digest.
Logged

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2013, 05:31:PM »
Hi Mat Rennie's are very good if you get indigestion ;) ;)
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2013, 05:32:PM »
Quote from: susan on January 08, 2013, 05:31:PM
Hi Mat Rennie's are very good if you get indigestion ;) ;)

I'll keep that in mind!  ;D
Logged

Offline Nickos

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 576
  • R.I. 90
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2013, 10:46:AM »
Quote from: mat on January 08, 2013, 05:25:PM
Thanks, Hartley. 12. Is very interesting. Will print this off to digest.

Thanks Hartley - a very interesting read indeed.
Logged
Reality Check - What evidence is there to free JB? Answers on a very small postcard!

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2013, 10:55:AM »
Sir Henry Globe must have been tired that day.
Logged

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2014, 11:03:PM »
Bump
Logged

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2014, 09:35:AM »
Harters,this is great to look back on as we can't be expected to remember everything that was posted. :-[
Logged

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2014, 05:58:PM »
It would be more interesting to see the CCRC decisions so that we could see the exact arguments raised in full and why they failed.

It seems that at first that planned to be released here once the appela was settled but there was a change of heart and it never happened.
Logged
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

guest154

  • Guest
Re: 2012 Judicial Review Judgement
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2014, 06:47:PM »
Quote from: scipio_usmc on September 11, 2014, 05:58:PM
It would be more interesting to see the CCRC decisions so that we could see the exact arguments raised in full and why they failed.

It seems that at first that planned to be released here once the appela was settled but there was a change of heart and it never happened.

Are you suprised by that?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »