Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom  (Read 3145 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #30 on: January 07, 2013, 08:47:AM »
Morning Lugg

Patti is the Miss Marples of the forum :) :) :)

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #31 on: January 07, 2013, 08:51:AM »
Morning Lugg

Patti is the Miss Marples of the forum :) :) :)
Get off. She's not that old. ;D

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #32 on: January 07, 2013, 10:24:AM »
She was told on the 28th August and on the 2nd of September RB engaged a solicitor. I have already said this at least 3 times. I know what it says in RB statement but he got it wrong....if you read AE statement and other documents it will confirm this.  I'm not saying I am 100% right, but either way it was done pre trial......in order that Jeremy was disinherited and before he was found guilty.  :) :) :) :)

gran S. said its the devil at work and asked the doctor when am i going to die....according to AE.  Sorry to have to say that.

Hi Patti, my question wasn't 'when was MS told of the deaths' I already know that, it was 'when was she told that JB was responsible'. No one mentions that they told her JB was responsible, in fact AE states that they DIDN'T tell her of their suspicions and that MS didn't even ask about JB when she was told of the deaths. AE also mentions that MS didn't ask about JB until December 1985 (long after his arrest) but she doesn't mention about what they told her - presumably the will had been changed at this point? If she didn't know he was involved, why would she 'cut him out'? Because no one mentioned JB, did she presume he died too? I have pasted the relevant page of AE's 1991 statement below to save anyone having to trawl through the whole thing.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 10:34:AM by Caroline »

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #33 on: January 07, 2013, 10:34:AM »
Hi Patti, my question wasn't 'when was MS told of the deaths' I already know that, it was 'when was she told that JB was responsible'. No one mentions that they told her JB was responsible, in fact AE states that they DIDN'T tell her of their suspicions and that MS didn't even ask about JB when she was told of the deaths. AE also mentions that MS didn't ask about JB until December 1985 (long after his arrest) but she doesn't mention about what they told her - presumably the will had been changed at this point? If she didn't know he was involved, why would she 'cut him out'? Because no one mentioned JB, did she presume he died too? I have pasted the relevant page of AE's 1991 statement below to save anyone having to trawl through the whole thing.
Thank you for clarifying things with Ann Eaton's statement Caroline. Could I ask just one question if anybody knows? Why do you think that Ann Eaton was asked that question as to when Mabel Speakman was told? And Who asked her that question? Was it the police, or someone else?

Hoping not to confuse things further, there was a Speakman who was a resident of Hailey House in Maldon, who was a relation to Mabel Speakman and the Boutflours. She died some years back now. I believe she had Alzheimer's and it was her greatest fear that Jeremy would some how escape and come after her. Just another point of interest.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 11:14:AM by Lugg »

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #34 on: January 07, 2013, 04:50:PM »
Hi Guys

The only other thing I can add to all of this, is that, no matter how you look at it.  The will was being put into place prior to Julie going to the police on the 7th of September, prior to JB's arrest on the 29th of September and prior to the trial. 

I am assuming that AE was asked loads of question by the LCP because Jeremy's defence team had lodged a complaint and they were obliged to investigate.   :) :) :) :) :)

Thank You Caroline  :) :) :) :) :)


Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2013, 05:42:PM »
Hi Guys

The only other thing I can add to all of this, is that, no matter how you look at it.  The will was being put into place prior to Julie going to the police on the 7th of September, prior to JB's arrest on the 29th of September and prior to the trial. 

I am assuming that AE was asked loads of question by the LCP because Jeremy's defence team had lodged a complaint and they were obliged to investigate.   :) :) :) :) :)

Thank You Caroline  :) :) :) :) :)

Well, I find that most odd! They didn't tell her that Jeremy was even alive?? If she had known, would she have kept him out of her will? Why would they not tell her?
« Last Edit: January 07, 2013, 05:43:PM by Caroline »

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom
« Reply #36 on: January 07, 2013, 06:03:PM »
Well, I find that most odd! They didn't tell her that Jeremy was even alive?? If she had known, would she have kept him out of her will? Why would they not tell her?

Hi Caroline, I agree....she would have kept him in her will if she didn't know, therefore she must have known something....AE admits it was done. to keep Jeremy for inheriting. I suppose we will never know eh?  :) :) :) :)