Why the media cannot be behind Jeremy

[Aunt Agatha]

Andrea posted this somewhere else, thanks Andrea.

This is but one example (and a fine one at that) as to why the media CANNOT and WILL NOT support Jeremy.

I've said all along that the media cannot 'rock the boat' in regards to the whole Judicial System which is why I believe it will only be 'the people' , en mass, that will bring about true justice and help in the release of Jeremy.

Until that day - I believe Jeremy is going to stay where he is.   

If they can do this to Diana......Jeremy does not stand a chance!!

[Aunt Agatha]

Full film. Banned in the UK. In the interests of justice and free speech, please watch and share this.

[andrea]

Its a good film AA isnt it, i watched it yesterday afternoon before i went partying!

[big-goolies]

I seem to remember the Daily Mail writing a couple of long articles about JB and they were against the police and its handling of the case and its doubtful evidence against JB...

[big-goolies]

Also the media is not to be trusted whatever it writes about....  newpapers are just about worthy of botty wiping paper

[tyler]

Also the media is not to be trusted whatever it writes about....  newpapers are just about worthy of botty wiping paper

So,we can apply that logic with regards to the newspaper story of Jeremy "allegedly" trying to sell nude photographs of his sister to the media then?

[big-goolies]

So,we can apply that logic with regards to the newspaper story of Jeremy "allegedly" trying to sell nude photographs of his sister to the media then?

do those photos even exist ?

[big-goolies]

So,we can apply that logic with regards to the newspaper story of Jeremy "allegedly" trying to sell nude photographs of his sister to the media then?

 
if the media 'claims' that then no the media is not to be trusted , if JB actually tried that then he is not to be trusted.....
 
take your pick i guess

[tyler]

do those photos even exist ?

Yes.......they were contained on slides? and I believe they are in Colin's possession.

[SIMONJONES]

The media are neither pro Bamber nor anti Bamber.

The media are interested in stories that sell off the printed page or online.

As with the example of the Daily Mail - 'Bamber Innocent', followed by 'Bamber Guilty' some years later. 

Woofinden gets his fee, and then he gets another one.

I'm hard pushed to think of more than a couple of journalists / media producers out of at least a hundred or so I'm in contact with who think Bamber might be innocent. However. Eric Allison ( Guardian ) was pro Bamber when I spoke to him 2 years ago.

You won't get 'the people' en-masse to join a crusade to free Jeremy Bamber. That is never going to happen.

Forums, Twitter and any other social networking sites are not going to make any difference to the WHF case.

No major breakthrough has been made on this case in the last 20 years.

That is not to say that the media have neglected the 'Bamber may be innocent' theories ( Aga etc ).

Equally, production companies see enough interest in the case to produce documentaries - but the reason they make these programmes is commercial and not with any bias towards Jeremy Bamber.

If Simon McKay hits on anything I'm sure the media will publish it but it is now accepted by people at the heart of the case ( I'm not sure about McKay - he never got back to me, probably for good reason ) that the end of the road has now been reached.

It should be remembered that Bamber is a 'business commodity'.

I do have something further on this but only by PM if anyone should show interest.



 

[big-goolies]

Yes.......they were contained on slides? and I believe they are in Colin's possession.

i dont know that much about this case but i'll see if i can get this straight..... i can assume that if they do exist like you say , does that mean they were 'private' images for them to be in Colins possession.  If they were from SB's 'modelling' career i'd have to assume that the photographer was honest enough to return said photos.

[Aunt Agatha]

Its a good film AA isnt it, i watched it yesterday afternoon before i went partying!

It's a bloody good example of what happens behind closed doors!!!

One can also see why it was banned in this country, along with the book, Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence.

Jeremy's case (though nowhere near the league of Diana's) is a complete cover up too.  The film, if one cares to watch it all, is based on fact and displays without question those involved in the cover up and the lengths people will go to to ensure the truth does not come out.

Please, watch the movie!!

[Caroline R]

Hi, for some reason this thread was on twice. This one had more posts so I have left this one up and removed the second copy.

Cheers!!

[Lugg]

This forum wealds more power than some think it does. And just think of the many legal minds that have become interested in this case. This forum must be counted as media as well as the national rags who are in it just for the money. SJ is only here to discourage the Bamber supporters.

[big-goolies]

It's a bloody good example of what happens behind closed doors!!!

One can also see why it was banned in this country, along with the book, Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence.

Jeremy's case (though nowhere near the league of Diana's) is a complete cover up too.  The film, if one cares to watch it all, is based on fact and displays without question those involved in the cover up and the lengths people will go to to ensure the truth does not come out.

Please, watch the movie!!

if you believe in cover ups and conspiracy theories then maybe you should move to Americaland with the other fruits and cranks