Complications in LCN DNA

[killingeve]

Patti and NN (actually, I thought NaNu worked quite well) Hi and good morning. I think our Steve looks on RW's book as the bible. Forgive my Sister, I meant no offence

Hello April1

Yes NaNu is cool.  Naughty Nun is a bit of typeful so either NaNu or NN is fine. 

I have recently read Roger Wilkes and Colin Caffell's book and find Steve_uk's posts so prone to embellishment that I no longer think he believes what he posts.  Think he enjoys playing devil's advocate  .



 

[Patti]

Hello Patti

Lol my friend I'm a bloody nun not a scientist  .   It sounds the business with input from various top players.  It's complex but written in such a way, along with diagrams and tables, that the layperson can make some sense of it.  I will need to spend some time re-reading it to summarise it before posting.  You and your friend Bridget can then let me know what you think  .

Really? Which convent do you belong to? More to the point who let you out....hahahahahahahaha 

We will....wont we Bridget?? 

[Boo]

Hello April1

Yes NaNu is cool.  Naughty Nun is a bit of typeful so either NaNu or NN is fine. 

I have recently read Roger Wilkes and Colin Caffell's book and find Steve_uk's posts so prone to embellishment that I no longer think he believes what he posts.  Think he enjoys playing devil's advocate  .

Hi NN, I have read both books recently too and have to admit I was not particularly impressed by either... Roger Wilkes' book says a lot without backing much up, if that makes sense. The Colin Caffell book I found very moving but I almost found it a bit ... fanciful may be the right word. I think it is important to question everything, and neither book helped me to back up my mind about this case.

[killingeve]

Hi NN, I have read both books recently too and have to admit I was not particularly impressed by either... Roger Wilkes' book says a lot without backing much up, if that makes sense. The Colin Caffell book I found very moving but I almost found it a bit ... fanciful may be the right word. I think it is important to question everything, and neither book helped me to back up my mind about this case.

Hello Boo

Yes I agree with the above.  Neither book comes close to providing any firm evidence but I picked up some useful bits and pieces.  Certainly chapters 42 - 45 of Wilkes' book helped my understanding of the silencer/blood aspects of the case.  Anyway going off the title of the thread so I might start a couple on the individual books.  I would say though having read the books they only served to futher reinforce my belief in Jeremy's innocence.