How to prove Jeremy was framed for the murders, with dodgy silencer evidence...

[mike tesko]

Here is evidence to prove that DS Jones took possession of four exhibits, SBJ/4, SBJ/3, SBJ/2 and SBJ/1, from the scene, which have been since ghosted out of the case:-

These four exhibits were seized and in the possession of the police before Jeremy made his second witness statement, on 8th August 1985...

[mike tesko]

Somebody in high places is going to have to start taking notice sooner or later, Dodgy silencer evidence, and dodgy police officers, DS Jones, and PI Miller, add up to a miscarriage of justice, which requires these convictions to be quashed...

[mike tesko]

Silencer wasn't found on 10th August 1985, it had been found on 7th August 1985, by DS Jones, and replaced back into the gun cupboard on evening of 9th August 1985 when police gave keys to whf back to family - relatives simply recovered the same silencer which the police had put back / returned...

[mike tesko]

I will do evrything I can to try to make sure the dodgy silencer evidence is undodged, and the truth about how it was manipulated to get Jeremy Bamber convicted becomes accepted for what it was / is - unsafe evidence...

[mike tesko]

Linked to this, is the red paint found on the end of a guns barrel, as mentioned by DS Davidson, to COLP during his 1991 police interviews, and the possible existence of scratch marks on the underside of the aga surround in the kktchen at whf - Davidson told COLP that COOK had taken a paint sample, RC/1 on the 8th August 1985, because of this red paint found on the end of a guns barrel, which Cook handed to him at the scene on 8th August 1985, Davidson explained to COLP that he was talking about paint found on the end of  guns barrel, not a silencer...

Cook denies taking a paint sample (RC/1) on 8th August 1985, or giving such a paint sample to DS Davidson at the scene on that date...

Cook is a crook, a dodgy fucker, nothing he says should be believed, in my book he is a scumbag and should be prosecuted, convicted, and thrown into jail with no possibility of ever being released the evil piece of shit...

[mike tesko]

S o, whichever way you look at the scratch mark evidence, was it / they made by the end of the guns barrel, or the silencer, or both?

If both, which marked the aga surround first, the guns barrel, or the silencer?

Both the guns barrel, and the silencer, could not have made the same mark on the aga...

So police got rid of the fact that on 7th August 1985, DS Jones sseized exhibit SBJ/1 (silencer) at the scene, because by 8th August 1985, paint had been found on the end of a guns barrel (metal end cap - court exhibit 49), and Cook had taken a paint sample, RC/1, from the aga that date, and handed it to DS Davidson whilst both were at the scene. Police must have been satisfied on 8th August 1985, that the end of a guns barrel had made any mark on the aga surround, not a silencer, because on and by evening of 9th August 1985, DS Jones had returned the silencer back into the gun cupboard, acting on instruction of DCI Jones...

[mike tesko]

State and condition of silencer found by family on 10th August 1985, has to be treated with skeptism because nobody but the police know what happened to the silencer whilst they had it in their possession between 7th and 9th August 1985 - for example, did the police innocently or accidentally contaminate it whilst eliminating it from their enquiries, at a time when they were convinced that any marks made on the aga had been done by the end of a guns barrel, not a / the silencer?

[mike tesko]

Once the nature of the investigation changed from SC/688/85 (four murders and a suicide), to SC/786/85 (five murders), decision was taken to ghet rid of paint evidence found on end of guns barrel, and switch it to the silencer, which required that all or as much as necessary of the paint contaminated guns barrel and the taking of paint sample RC/1 from the scene on 8th August 1985, be eradicated or struck out, and the find of the silencer put at 10th August 1985, as found by the family, not by DS Jones on 7th August 1985...

[mike tesko]

Once the nature of the investigation changed from SC/688/85 (four murders and a suicide), to SC/786/85 (five murders), decision was taken to ghet rid of paint evidence found on end of guns barrel, and switch it to the silencer, which required that all or as much as necessary of the paint contaminated guns barrel and the taking of paint sample RC/1 from the scene on 8th August 1985, be eradicated or struck out, and the find of the silencer put at 10th August 1985, as found by the family, not by DS Jones on 7th August 1985...

This is why the property books had to be re-written, and any reference in the newly written property books makes no mention of the seizure of exhibits SBJ/1, SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4, and why no information has been disclosed about the find of the metal end cap (court exhibit 49) which fits onto the end of the guns barrel...

[mike tesko]

The truth about what happened and what the police have had to get up to so that they could prosecute and convict Jeremy bamber for these murders is almost reconstrcuted...

[mike tesko]

I will be back later with more information and evidence relating to what the police did, and what they have done, and how they did what they did, or done what they done...

[lookout]

Mike,,this really is outrageous,,and is deserving of a front page in every newspaper imaginable.

[Steve_uk]

I'm still not clear if you could explain:are you saying that DS Jones removed a silencer from the gun cupboard days after the murder and then replaced it back there for the relatives to find? Whom are you blaming for the blob of blood found in the baffles plates,and why was June's DNA present on the silencer?

[lookout]

I'm still not clear if you could explain:are you saying that DS Jones removed a silencer from the gun cupboard days after the murder and then replaced it back there for the relatives to find? Whom are you blaming for the blob of blood found in the baffles plates,and why was June's DNA present on the silencer?

Steve,,why wouldn't Junes' blood be present.? The poor woman was, by all accounts, bloodied from top to bottom,more so than any of the others.

[Caroline R]

I'm still not clear if you could explain:are you saying that DS Jones removed a silencer from the gun cupboard days after the murder and then replaced it back there for the relatives to find? Whom are you blaming for the blob of blood found in the baffles plates,and why was June's DNA present on the silencer?

Steve, you are being misleading, it was never stated that the DNA was June's, just that it was likely to have been a female relative.