Hi curious the burns to Nevill I assume you're referring to remain a mystery. The last thing I read the guns barrel could not be heated to a high enough point in order to cause them.
Hi Steve
For me, what is interesting is that this is being considered by EP at the material time. Maybe EP were considering if the gun was used with or without a silencer fitted in order to rule the silencer in or the silencer out of the equation. I note Taff Jones is recorded as being present at the meeting and Taff Jones was the exponent of the murder suicide theory. As such questions were being asked and noted with his full knowledge and not behind his back.
The other thing to bare in mind is that this is also being noted whilst EP are allegedly trying to frame Jeremy and allegedly trying to set up witnesses.
Additionally, I thought grounds for appeal via the CCRC route would have to be on the basis of new evidence.
With a copy of these notes clearly not being withheld under PII and a copy being with the defence how can the recent experiments be considered as new evidence? In any event surely this point of argument should have been raised by the defence at the original trial.
