Author Topic: Re-enactment of raid - Log details confirming attendance of support unit...  (Read 5562 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mb1

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 514
I haven't seen anything that proves 'support unit' means re-enactment. Even if it did, couldn't that mean a 'walkthrough'?

If there is one thing this scene needed, it was someone to follow the evidence and try to make real sense of who did what and when.

The 'suicide'  muddied everything, and made for lazy 'don't need to prove anything' policing.


Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------

On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------

On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?

I don't know, but Jeremy seems to think that it's a significant issue. Time will tell I suppose.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Anyway, the presence of a "support unit" means nothing to me. How does that prove there was a re-enactment. I do dislike that term "re-enactment". To me it means a repeat of what happened, rather than a lesson in what should have happened.
--------------------------------------------

On page two of Jeremy's recent letter addressed to me (posted) he speaks of the 17 additional police officers who attended the scene, that no-ione else there mentions or refers to - what do you think these 17 police officers could have been doing at the scene, inside the house, that required no mention of their attendance there?

I don't know, but Jeremy seems to think that it's a significant issue. Time will tell I suppose.
------------------------------------

Yes, he has additional material connected to this matter (as do I) which cannot be posted for obvious reasons...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...