Author Topic: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86  (Read 34837 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #60 on: August 30, 2012, 08:56:PM »
Mike, would you be prepared to detail your own theory, from what you now suspect, in a similar format to this?:

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/what-really-happened

A numbered step by step account (of mainly the raid).  Inclusive of the alleged mishandling of the rifle / informatives on site.

Perhaps this diagram might help:-
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Nickos

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 576
  • R.I. 90
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #61 on: August 31, 2012, 10:04:AM »
This suggests in the clearest possible terms that Craig knew a second wound was inflicted later.

This is a point I tried to cover earlier (post #18).

If Craig had certified SC as dead at the stage he saw one wound, then the implication is that SC died of that wound. A second shot inflicted later could not have killed her again!

Is your theory that at the time Craig "certified death" SC was in fact still alive - so effectively Craig was a useless doctor, as he could not tell whether a person was dead or not? 

The point (to me is) could the one wound, witnessed by Craig, could still have been administered by JB?

Reality Check - What evidence is there to free JB? Answers on a very small postcard!

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #62 on: August 31, 2012, 10:11:AM »
This is a point I tried to cover earlier (post #18).

If Craig had certified SC as dead at the stage he saw one wound, then the implication is that SC died of that wound. A second shot inflicted later could not have killed her again!

Is your theory that at the time Craig "certified death" SC was in fact still alive - so effectively Craig was a useless doctor, as he could not tell whether a person was dead or not? 

The point (to me is) could the one wound, witnessed by Craig, could still have been administered by JB?
I still wonder, if as claimed by Hartley I think that the dr. didnt touch Sheila how could he be absolutely sure there were no signs of life? No one can look at a body and be certain without checking for slightest pulse etc. I have seen drs certify many deaths in the past. I have never seen a dr just look from a distance without some sort of even the most routine and basic test. imo

Offline curiousessex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1418
  • ROCH INDEX 70
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #63 on: August 31, 2012, 10:14:AM »
Perhaps this diagram might help:-

Mike

I am afraid your theory is inconsistent with a statement that is dated 7th August 1985 which is the same day as the killings and at a time when everything was still being treated as Jeremy had described i.e. the alleged telephone call from Nevill.

Dr Ian Donaldson Craig clearly states in his statement dated 7th August 1985....

'There was what I took to be a .22 rifle lying across her body with a muzzle pointing upwards towards her head and her right hand lying loosely over the butt. There was a quantity of dried blood which had come apparently from her mouth and what appeared to be an entry wound in her throat. I certified death at 8.44 a.m.'

This statement applied to a situation which was, at that time, being considered by all as a murder suicide. Indeed the next day the front pages of the national press proclaimed the events of a murder suicide at WHF in Essex.

The rifle is independently witnessed by a Dr to be on Sheila's body at 8.44am which is the time of Sheila's certified death.

According to your posted bullet point theory please can you explain how a Dr could accurately describe the result of Essex police, 90 minutes later, with a view to framing Jeremy and before the relatives or Julie Mugford had made any statements, moving a rifle from near a window and placing it upon Sheila's body with 'the muzzle pointing upwards towards her head' and her 'right hand lying loosely over the butt'?
« Last Edit: August 31, 2012, 10:17:AM by curiousessex »

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #64 on: August 31, 2012, 10:16:AM »
He only mentions one wound on all the victims. He didnt go into greater detail because he knew that a Post Mortem would be taking place. I dont believe there is anything sinister in it.

Mike, could you post Bews and Myalls statements please. Fielders, too, if you have it, thanks .
« Last Edit: August 31, 2012, 10:22:AM by Andrea »
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #65 on: August 31, 2012, 10:43:AM »
I still wonder, if as claimed by Hartley I think that the dr. didnt touch Sheila how could he be absolutely sure there were no signs of life? No one can look at a body and be certain without checking for slightest pulse etc. I have seen drs certify many deaths in the past. I have never seen a dr just look from a distance without some sort of even the most routine and basic test. imo

A pointer toward the fact that Sheila may have " appeared " to be dead would have been the drugs inside her body,which would have slowed the pulse ( if the dr. felt one ) ,but her brain activity would not have been dead. But unless certain signs were examined,he couldn't have stated,from a distance,that she was dead. Because the heart stops doesn't always necessarily mean that a person is dead.

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #66 on: August 31, 2012, 10:53:AM »
Do you think Sheila was still alive at this point, lookout?
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #67 on: August 31, 2012, 10:56:AM »
Do you think Sheila was still alive at this point, lookout?

There's every possibility,Andrea. As brain activity wouldn't have ceased.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #68 on: August 31, 2012, 11:12:AM »
There's every possibility,Andrea. As brain activity wouldn't have ceased.
Thing is Lookout, I would hope I am never certified dead by a dr looking at me from a distance unless I'd been decapitated!!   :o

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #69 on: August 31, 2012, 11:16:AM »
Thing is Lookout, I would hope I am never certified dead by a dr looking at me from a distance unless I'd been decapitated!!   :o

lol
....just cos I eat worms...

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #70 on: August 31, 2012, 11:19:AM »
Thing is Lookout, I would hope I am never certified dead by a dr looking at me from a distance unless I'd been decapitated!!   :o

Clearly, for whatever reason, Dr. Craig was able to come to the conclusion that she was obviously deceased.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #71 on: August 31, 2012, 11:20:AM »
Thing is Lookout, I would hope I am never certified dead by a dr looking at me from a distance unless I'd been decapitated!!   :o

Me neither,Maggie,,and mistakes have been made too.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #72 on: August 31, 2012, 11:22:AM »
Clearly, for whatever reason, Dr. Craig was able to come to the conclusion that she was obviously deceased.

Yes,and it would be interesting to find out what his findings were too.

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #73 on: August 31, 2012, 11:24:AM »
Clearly, for whatever reason, Dr. Craig was able to come to the conclusion that she was obviously deceased.

I agree, he also knew that a post Mortem examination was going to be carried out at a later date, so he didnt need to describe all the wounds each victim had either. Just the fact that they had all been shot. IMO.
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Dr. Ian Donaldson Craig 12-11-86
« Reply #74 on: August 31, 2012, 11:30:AM »
Yes,and it would be interesting to find out what his findings were too.

Well, he found out that she was dead, hence him certifying her death.