Patti,
it is obvious what I am trying to say here isnt it?? You stated quite clearly that 'it must have been someone INSIDE the house' What I am trying to suggest is that Bamber knew of a way into the house, and had used it before and after the murders took lace, so why are you excluding him? Please answer my question.
Incidently dont you find it somewhat odd that Bamber - after questioning and the police revealing to him that they suspected that he got in through the toilet window - decides to use that VERY window to climb through afterwards? Are you suggesting that the window was fully tested in September AND again exactly the same test was applied in October? Or was a more 'perfunctory' examination carried out in September just like the initial search of the farmhouse by police? Let's sort this out.
I said what I said about the extensive examination on the 8th of September. Forensics found nothing.
Now, if someone had entered in and out of a newly painted window the forensic team would have found something. You either agree with that or you don't agree.
On the 27th RWC took the catch from the toilet/bathroom window. Exhibit RWC/8
On the 1st of October Elliot's forensic team looks at the catch on the same window and said it was scratched.....So what catch was that? Who put it there if R Cook took it on the 27th? 4 days before. Did RWC replace the catch? Also note that the outside of that window was fresh and clean........
Yes, why would Jeremy be so silly as to enter that said window.....I ask you...Jeremy had already admitted to getting into WHF.....When questioned he states clearly that anyone could have got in through any of the windows, but you can't close it and lock it from the outside....
I would know how to enter my windows, i think if you survey a million people you would have a high percentage of people with knowledge on how to gain entry to their own property.....Just because he knew how to get in, does not make him a killer.....Julie knew, the extended family knew....where they in the dock?
