I am getting tired Moe and, I think you are picking on me at this time of night.
Ok quickly I will tell you why I think Sheila committed the murders.
1, She was ill, I don't like using the word schizophrenic, but I have to use in this case.
2, Windows I have highlighted.
3, She was too clean....I will expand on that tomorrow.
4, She had partially digested food in her stomach, which suggest she had eaten within 4 hours.
5, It is documented that she had episodes during the night, then she would appear calm.
6, She was a farmers daughter, she lived most of her life around guns, a child could have used that gun, the recoil was so small.
A criminologist will tell you that it is more likely that Sheila fitted the profile, than Jeremy. Although, that is not evidence, is is worth considering important factors that make people with schizophrenia kill...
Take the lad in America recently that shot 12 people at a cinema....he was diagnosed with schizophrenia the day before the murders. He was ill....no doubt about that...but look at the profile...lonely, within, quiet, not with it, never hurt a sole....then flip! Many cases studies show that this illness is one of the most dangerous in our current times....
That's it now, I am off to bed....Night all 
I cannot believe that you are using these ludicrously spurious examples to prove her 'guilt'
Having a mental illness does NOT make someone guilty. I just cannot for the life of me understand why an seemingly intelligent person would use them. ALL of those examples are manufactured and tentative, I cannot wait to hear you reasons about Sheila's cleanliness............front row seats for that one Patti!
It dawns on me that many reasons on here are stretched to breaking point to try to prove Bamber didn't do it. I for one am a little tired of the mental heath issue being bandied around like it was a volleyball by those that really should know better. Maybe we should start the conversation off with talking about Bamber's psychopathy?? Of course it wouldn't be right or fair.
Has it ever dawned on you Patti that you may, just may be blaming a defenseless, mentally ill young woman that was cruelly murdered along with her parents and children? Bamber has a voice in which to defend himself.............Sheila has not. If this is the sort of 'evidence' that you have been using to condemn Sheila Cafell (and you have loudly and at length) I am utterly staggered. I hope I am wrong in that you have more evidence with which to point the finger at this woman because from where I am standing you could not get a conviction for jaywalking based on what you have just said.
