Apology

[maggie]

Well enough people on here have mentioned it. But few acknowledge that it was from RWB's jumbo book of crackpot ideas. And the police believed it enough to examine "a" wetsuit.

[grahameb]

I have only browsed these pages and have neither contributed or paid any great attention of late, so forgive me if this sounds ridiculous or has already been stated, but...........

The link that Roch has just given - if the wetsuit where a two piece, wouldn't each piece be given a different article code?

The suit I have is jacket at top (because it has long sleeves) and trousers....but its one piece!   Black and red!

Are you absolutely certain, without question, it was/is a two piece that the police looked at and examined and not a one piece?

AA look for brown stains on the inside. It might tell you if it is the same one?

[Bridget]

AA look for brown stains on the inside. It might tell you if it is the same one?

 

[grahameb]

I didn't realise what I wrote til I read it again. I meant that they tested the brown stains inside the wetsuit top.

[Aunt Agatha]

AA look for brown stains on the inside. It might tell you if it is the same one?

Ugh!!!  I hope he wore trunks under it!!   

[Aunt Agatha]

Ugh!!!  I hope he wore trunks under it!!   

No brown stains at all.......phew!!    It came to me in very good condition though I know Jeremy had worn it - he told me so!!

[maggie]

I didn't realise what I wrote til I read it again. I meant that they tested the brown stains inside the wetsuit top.

 

[Aunt Agatha]

Yes, certain, it's mentioned as two articles in 3 different places and this one was red and blue.

Thank you Bridget.     

[campion]

l o lebalab,  Posts #41&42.
  ' Sloppy Joes' - Behind the Scenes,  Fajitas.   3.21 min.