Author Topic: Who were the Defendants in this case?  (Read 34940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #255 on: July 14, 2012, 11:20:PM »
I think Hartley mentioned that the house still has the same wallpaper, and the broken lampshade is still in place.

Hi Buddy, I know the farm was rented, but the house had been in the family for years...I'm only quoting what AE said in her statement and was querying what she meant..."He never gave in and, never and still hasn't" and the house is still more or less the same...I find it odd?  :) :)

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #256 on: July 14, 2012, 11:34:PM »
I think Hartley mentioned that the house still has the same wallpaper, and the broken lampshade is still in place.
Ive seen online AE saying to actress Diane Keen the shade could not be replaced it was an antique, i recall diane on agreed visit to whf she noted the kitchen light had no shade.

Buddy

  • Guest
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #257 on: July 14, 2012, 11:44:PM »
Hi Buddy, I know the farm was rented, but the house had been in the family for years...I'm only quoting what AE said in her statement and was querying what she meant..."He never gave in and, never and still hasn't" and the house is still more or less the same...I find it odd?  :) :)
The house stood empty for some years Patti.I believe someone wanted to turn it into a whodunnit attraction. The land was being managed by the Eatons, and moved in after the proposal of it being turned into a tourist attraction. Mind you they made a bundle selling their own house.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33772
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #258 on: July 15, 2012, 08:47:AM »
Hi Buddy, I know the farm was rented, but the house had been in the family for years...I'm only quoting what AE said in her statement and was querying what she meant..."He never gave in and, never and still hasn't" and the house is still more or less the same...I find it odd?  :) :)

Hi Patti, good morning. Does it not seem strange that AE should be showing such deference to Jeremy's wishes? Why do you think she would give a toss one way or the other about how he feels. She may well have some deepseated reason for not wanting things changed, but I very much doubt Jeremy to be one of them.

I'm very interested to know about the ring that Jeremy wanted "to be buried with her." To which ring do you think he was referring? June's engagement/wedding rin comes to mind, but June wasn't buried. This suggests either, Jeremy didn't want anyone else in the family to have them.......or, somebody overrode his decision to bury and decided to cremate? What do you think, Patti?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #259 on: July 15, 2012, 10:10:AM »
I can fully understand why Jeremy wants WHF left as it originally was,,,as far as he's concerned,time had stood still when he was imprisoned and he wanted to remember how the place was should he ever return.
He's obviously the sentimental type.

It's memories for him rather than anything sinister behind his wishes. He's obviously someone who doesn't like change and would rather things stayed as they were when it was his home.
Being a Georgian-built property,,any alteration either inside or out would not add to the ambience and beauty of a Grade 2 listed building,,as usually the contents,furnishings,etc reflect the type of house it is. 

 

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #260 on: July 15, 2012, 11:05:AM »
I can fully understand why Jeremy wants WHF left as it originally was,,,as far as he's concerned,time had stood still when he was imprisoned and he wanted to remember how the place was should he ever return.
He's obviously the sentimental type.

It's memories for him rather than anything sinister behind his wishes. He's obviously someone who doesn't like change and would rather things stayed as they were when it was his home.
Being a Georgian-built property,,any alteration either inside or out would not add to the ambience and beauty of a Grade 2 listed building,,as usually the contents,furnishings,etc reflect the type of house it is.
Yet there are other witnesses that say Jeremy wanted to move out of the property? I sense a bit of a contradiction in Ann's words myself?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33772
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #261 on: July 15, 2012, 11:19:AM »
Yet there are other witnesses that say Jeremy wanted to move out of the property? I sense a bit of a contradiction in Ann's words myself?

How would Jeremy know, one way or the other, how WHF was furnished or decorated. I can't imagine AE is one of his regular visitors or correspondents.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #262 on: July 15, 2012, 07:00:PM »
Hi Rochford

You sound rather like a BGB albeit a nice one  :)  Have you tried Tokyo by Brew Dog @ 18.2%?  330ml x 18.2%abv / 1000ml = 6.0 units per bottle  :)  The strongest I've had is an Austrian beer, Samichlaus at 14%  :).  Very nice.  Not like barley wine.  I cld only ever drink one bottle on its own though. 

Just tried uploading a pic but have been unable to do so.  Assume this is due to lack of capacity on the server?  I was so pleased with myself for figuring out how to do it only to be told it cldn't be done as the file was too big.

Any luck with those medi records?  They must be available otherwise why wld they have those little boxes representing attachments?   

Miss you already :-*

I've never tried any of those beers but they sound lethal  :D   The figures in the boxes on the .org site?  They don't do anything when you click on them.  I have recently sent a message to the person behind the site but have not heard back.  I will pm you, maybe you could contact them directly.   8) :-*


Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #263 on: July 15, 2012, 07:04:PM »
What page on that site are you looking at?
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #264 on: July 16, 2012, 09:48:AM »
What page on that site are you looking at?

Bridget, Egap is referring to the numbers in square brackets, on this occasion the page relating to JB where it mentions his medical records. If you place your cursor over the square bracketed numbers, a hand appears but nothing happens when you click.  I think they are just numbered references.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #265 on: July 16, 2012, 09:51:AM »
Hi Rochford

Yes I don't understand, why have those little boxes representing attachments if they're unavailable?  Thanks for your endeavours so far.  Do you know who owns the site?

Hi, didn't see this before.  I've replied to Bridget above.  I think PDF format docs do this.  Where a white hand icon appears over certain points but nothing happens when you click on those points.  Check your pms.  :)
« Last Edit: July 16, 2012, 09:52:AM by Roch »

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #266 on: July 18, 2012, 01:03:AM »
I think Hartley mentioned that the house still has the same wallpaper, and the broken lampshade is still in place.

If it helps or is even relevant to anything, in any way,  the broken lamp shade is most certainly not still in place.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #267 on: July 18, 2012, 03:10:AM »
The house stood empty for some years Patti.I believe someone wanted to turn it into a whodunnit attraction. The land was being managed by the Eatons, and moved in after the proposal of it being turned into a tourist attraction. Mind you they made a bundle selling their own house.

Wow! Who's idea was that?

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Who were the Defendants in this case?
« Reply #268 on: July 18, 2012, 08:53:AM »
Wow! Who's idea was that?

It was an idea kicked around by the charity who owns the property.

The suggestion that the Eatons sold their previous residence (Oak Farm), is incorrect, they still own it to this day and rent it out. Not that there would have been anything wrong if they had sold it, I don't understand the argument.