Julie Mugford Witness Statement Dated 08/09/1985

[-Harters-]

I'm not sure what you mean 

All of these tricks and deception from Mike (which is without a shadow of a doubt, what they are), may fool a few lay people on the forum but it's not going to fool the CCRC or Court of Appeal.

[Roch]

All of these tricks and deception from Mike (which is without a shadow of a doubt, what they are), may fool a few lay people on the forum but it's not going to fool the CCRC or Court of Appeal.

What's that got to do with 2007 & 2011 forensic science letters re the logs?  All I'm trying to ascertain is whether the tampering refers the phone log. 

[-Harters-]

What's that got to do with 2007 & 2011 forensic science letters re the logs?  All I'm trying to ascertain is whether the tampering refers the phone log.

Nothing suggests that it does.

[Roch]

Nothing suggests that it does.

It must refer to the logs at the scene then.  My mistake.  There's that many terms:

Wireless Message Log
Essex Police Communications Log
Scene & Event Log
Police Radio Log

[mike tesko]

All of these tricks and deception from Mike (which is without a shadow of a doubt, what they are), may fool a few lay people on the forum but it's not going to fool the CCRC or Court of Appeal.

"Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"...