Author Topic: Jackie  (Read 41789 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: Jackie
« Reply #240 on: June 23, 2012, 02:20:PM »
Hi tyler  Neil is the gentleman of the forum with a heart of gold :)

Is he indeed Susan?  Perhaps Neil has not been at the receiving end of some of the abuse, insults and threats which have been flying around.  If he had been I suspect his views might be somewhat different.

 

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Jackie
« Reply #241 on: June 23, 2012, 02:20:PM »
I am more than capable of taking care of myself, and answering for myself. But you cant expect me to answer for others.

Yes, lets leave it there.
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Jackie
« Reply #242 on: June 23, 2012, 02:31:PM »
Hi ngb1066 I understand where you are coming from and agree totally it is I judge people on how they treat me and he has always been so polite but that does not mean I agree with his posts because we are two individuals who have different takes on many subjects.  I certainly would never never condone abusive behaviour from anyone and in my opinion it is inexcusable.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Jackie
« Reply #243 on: June 23, 2012, 02:32:PM »
Take no notice of Susan she has just threatened to slap me hahahahahah  :) :) :)

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #244 on: June 23, 2012, 02:43:PM »
Is he indeed Susan?  Perhaps Neil has not been at the receiving end of some of the abuse, insults and threats which have been flying around.  If he had been I suspect his views might be somewhat different.
I presumed that that quote was referring to your good self.  I guess that Jackie must have said some awful things to you, which I'd hope she now very much regrets.  You know that she's not a bad person though, don't you?  Seeing her posting on the 'shit forum' made me feel so sorry for her.

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Jackie
« Reply #245 on: June 23, 2012, 02:53:PM »
Why feel sorry for her, Neil?

She wants to be there, obviously. On the "shit forum" as you call it.
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #246 on: June 23, 2012, 03:09:PM »
Why feel sorry for her, Neil?

She wants to be there, obviously. On the "shit forum" as you call it.
Hi Andrea,
I guess she's just using 'the other forum' as a platform to voice her grievance.  I don't suppose its easy for her being there and having to be so contrite! 

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Jackie
« Reply #247 on: June 23, 2012, 03:14:PM »
I still think its odd.
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #248 on: June 23, 2012, 05:50:PM »
Andrea - welcome to my world. When you post on both forums you have to explain why, you have to defend the fact that you are there and here - I have had to do it numerous times.

I have lost count of how many times I have said on the red forum that they need to stop, that they have gone too far and that I don't agree. But this gets ignored here.

Actually, one time NGB did thank me for my comments on the red forum - but no one else has.

bloggs and son

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #249 on: June 24, 2012, 11:24:AM »
Andrea - welcome to my world. When you post on both forums you have to explain why, you have to defend the fact that you are there and here - I have had to do it numerous times.

I have lost count of how many times I have said on the red forum that they need to stop, that they have gone too far and that I don't agree. But this gets ignored here.

Actually, one time NGB did thank me for my comments on the red forum - but no one else has.
Whats all this red and blue forum stuff? Who started all this colour crap?

Offline andrea

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
Re: Jackie
« Reply #250 on: June 24, 2012, 11:30:AM »
Its a quick way to describe the forums.
On Ilkley Moor Baht'at.

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #251 on: June 24, 2012, 11:35:AM »
Can we please keep posts specifically about the two forums on the split topic thread?  This thread was originally about Jackiepreece. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #252 on: June 24, 2012, 11:44:AM »

Hi Rochford

Oh I'm so sorry have I been a naughty girl?  Am I in for a spank/some discipline :-[

What is a 'split topic' and how does one add to it?

Yes I will have to put you over my knee!  :P :P  :P

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2900.0.html

bloggs and son

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #253 on: June 24, 2012, 02:06:PM »
Hi Grahame

You're not going to like this...but it sounds quite healthy to me like a competitive team game.  Better than the 'Shit forum' or 'Swamp forum'.

Admittedly my knowledge of all the historical stuff is sketchy to say the least so if I was up to speed I may feel differently.

By the way keep seeing the word 'abuse' used.  Interested to understand what the definition is in terms of forum activity and spin offs?  Sounds pretty nasty.
Youre right I don't like it. You don't know the history that's for sure. You are only judging by what you see today. But this thing goes right back to the facebook bamber is guilty page and all the abuse they used to send people from there to the bamber supporters page. I am not going over all that again. Also you haven't seen the filth that has emanated from that disgusting page I think it quite an appropriate name for it to call it a shit forum and swamp forum. Perhaps if you had suffered FIRST HAND from their disgusting insults and have your daughter called a prostitute and in rehab and had you partner called an old goat who likes to have sex with animal you just may have a different view of them. For that excuse for a forum was specifically set up in order to abuse people who support Jeremy Bamber. But of course I forgot, you have the luxury of looking at things from outside all the abuse.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 02:08:PM by Grahame »

bloggs and son

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #254 on: June 24, 2012, 02:22:PM »
I can't get over just how ignorant people are about all this abuse and seem to want to treat this euphemistically termed "red" forum as if it is a legitimate forum with fair views of things and interested in actual justice? I don't get it are they really as blind as bats.
Someone said to me this morning that they are thoroughly demoralised about the whole thing. They've tried their best but because of all this abuse from various corners they feel utterly defeated. I must say I often feel the same myself. I cannot understand just why someone would set up a forum under the guise of miscarriage of justice and go on to target innocent members of another forum just because they are fighting what they believe to be a gross miscarriage of justice. Not only that but when these people  retaliate against all this sickening abuse that forum complains that they are the victims of the abuse. I tell you right now I am thoroughly pissed of with these creatures. Both those who dish out the abuse and those who will not see it as abuse, but would rather look on that terrible place as if they are a legitimate opposing contender. Well right now I really am at the bottom of the pit of depression about with this whole affair and must I feel make a final decision about it all. Tell you the truth I'm tired. I've been beat. Congratulations all you foul trolls. You can now go back to the swamp to have a victory party with old lamberton. You've finally won where I am concerned.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 02:23:PM by Grahame »