Jackie

[bloggs and son]

That may very well be your opinion. But as far as I am aware this is not your forum, you are not an administrator or moderator and are just a normal member like me. This means that whatever you may have posted is not set in stone as the rules of this forum.

Irrespective of what may or may not have been said on other forums, on this forum we should welcome all posters from either side of the fence, who have valuable contributions to make.

Therefore, as long as she abides by forum rules, Andrea should definitely be welcomed and encouraged to post and further debate, in my opinion.

Don't be so self righteous. Anyone who is a friend of lamberton is an enemy of mine.

[petey]

Don't be so self righteous. Anyone who is a friend of lamberton is an enemy of mine.

How i'm so glad i'm not as narrow minded as you

[Roch]

Grahame / Petey / Andrea...

People need to get stuff out of their system, which is good.  But let's try to keep things as reasonable as is possible, given the circs / differences.

[petey]

Grahame / Petey / Andrea...

People need to get stuff out of their system, which is good.  But let's try to keep things as reasonable as is possible, given the circs / differences.

Do you disagree with anything I have posted?!

[bloggs and son]

How i'm so glad i'm not as narrow minded as you

Unfortunately your blinkers don't allow you to see that you really are the narrow minded one here. Hypocrite.

[bloggs and son]

Grahame / Petey / Andrea...

People need to get stuff out of their system, which is good.  But let's try to keep things as reasonable as is possible, given the circs / differences.

Open your eyes roach for goodness sake.

[Roch]

Do you disagree with anything I have posted?!

I do not disagree with your sentiments regarding the forum / rules / decorum etc.  When people need to get things off their chest, their related posts are usually worded strongly.  This is fine but I wouldn't want things to descend any further than that. 

[Roch]

Open your eyes roach for goodness sake.

Grahame my eyes are open  :D  Tell me more... 

[bloggs and son]

I do not disagree with your sentiments regarding the forum / rules / decorum etc.  When people need to get things off their chest, their related posts are usually worded strongly.  This is fine but I wouldn't want things to descend any further than that.

I'm afraid its descended further than that. Ever since these numpties from the lamberton forum have been allowed to post without any apology or explanation as to why they ALL joined in the disgusting abuse (if they didn't object to it then they were part of it) directed at various members of this forum. They just come here telling everyone that "they can post where they like" in a presumptuous manner. Yet no apology whatsoever. Rather they "justify" themselves and think that they should be accepted "as long as they obey the rules". Well I've got new for you. They are still laughing at this forum even whilst they are posting. And petey called ME narrow minded. I think you will find that I probably are the most broad minded person on this forum. It's just that I can see through these characters and their underhanded ways. Why else would they be on this forum after mocking it and its members for so long on the lamberton forum. They even give these forums euphemistic names like Blue Forum and red forum. No, they are not those names they are Bamber forum and shit forum.

[andrea]

Youre entitled to views Grahame, as i am mine.


Thanks, petey 

[Roch]

I'm afraid its descended further than that. Ever since these numpties from the lamberton forum have been allowed to post without any apology or explanation as to why they ALL joined in the disgusting abuse (if they didn't object to it then they were part of it) directed at various members of this forum. They just come here telling everyone that "they can post where they like" in a presumptuous manner. Yet no apology whatsoever. Rather they "justify" themselves and think that they should be accepted "as long as they obey the rules". Well I've got new for you. They are still laughing at this forum even whilst they are posting. And petey called ME narrow minded. I think you will find that I probably are the most broad minded person on this forum. It's just that I can see through these characters and their underhanded ways. Why else would they be on this forum after mocking it and its members for so long on the lamberton forum. They even give these forums euphemistic names like Blue Forum and red forum. No, they are not those names they are Bamber forum and shit forum.

Ok.  You seem to be saying that Andrea has got some explaining to do, as per the above.  I cant do this for her.  Andrea seems to dfend her position when necessary, so she may respond on here.  You seem to be referring to several forum members.  Who are these members and should they also explain why they did not stand up and be counted, when abuse was being dished out on their forum, i.e. the other forum?

[andrea]

I'm not arguing with you Andrea. Coming back here as if nothing has happened indeed. Without any sense of responsibility or apology. You must be as blind as a bat not to know the trouble you have caused by actually being a part of that despicable forum after deleting you account here. Personally I am very surprised and might even say disgusted that you are even allowed to post here when I expressly posted some time ago that I didn't want you or your cronies back here at all. And now they are talking about a "permanent" ban for Jackie. Who has contributed far far more than you ever did.

I have nothing to apologise for, grahame. So i wont.

As for jackie having a permanent ban, that has nothing to do with me. yes jack has contributed more then me, because i only have an interest, thats it. I dont care who does what for bamber, i have no interest Grahame. He is where he should be in my opinion.
Not sure what else you want me to say? You talk about members on the red forum, some members here are no better, and you yourself have stoked the fires on more than one occasion. No one is perfect.

[bloggs and son]

Ok.  You seem to be saying that Andrea has got some explaining to do, as per the above.  I cant do this for her.  Andrea seems to dfend her position when necessary, so she may respond on here.  You seem to be referring to several forum members.  Who are these members and should they also explain why they did not stand up and be counted, when abuse was being dished out on their forum, i.e. the other forum?

They all shared in the abuse even if they deny it. Also they are still there as well as here. Why do you not know this roach? I simply cannot see why you were/are not aware of it?

[Neil]

Jackie is obviously in a desperate state, posting on the 'shit forum'.  Wouldn't it be a nice idea to show her a bit of compassion and find a way to resolve these differences?  Surely everyone is aware, that despite the odd rant, she is a caring, compassionate and general all round good egg.  I fear that the longer this goes on, the worse it will get.

[Roch]

They all shared in the abuse even if they deny it. Also they are still there as well as here. Why do you not know this roach? I simply cannot see why you were/are not aware of it?

I am aware that some members from there lurk on here.  With regards to profiles, I was aware that there are profiles on here belonging to members of the other forum but I don't know which members.  One member defected after the racism incident.