Author Topic: Jackie  (Read 41752 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Jackie
« Reply #15 on: June 21, 2012, 07:41:PM »

Why was Jackie banned? It wasn't arguing with me that got her banned. I got banned for asking her a question - Jackie wasn't banned at the same time as me.

I don't know the politics around that mat....I am not privy to why either of you were banned. It should really be kept quiet.... ;) ;) ;)

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2012, 07:42:PM »
I don't know the politics around that mat....I am not privy to why either of you were banned. It should really be kept quiet.... ;) ;) ;)

Oh, okay. I just thought people believed it was because she was arguing with me.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2012, 07:44:PM »
Quote
Mat is threatening to expose certain people here, should his ban be made permanent

Where are these threats, does anyone have a link?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2012, 07:46:PM »
Where are these threats, does anyone have a link?

It's on the other forum. I said I would ask NGB if I was allowed to post about my falling out with people here - and post some PM's.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2012, 07:48:PM »
Im a little upset due to my battle over my phone contract ive not been posting much i was unaware jackie and mat were under a ban, some member was asking about the prievious bans and i thought it was no need to enter that topic , right i will send jackie a email.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #20 on: June 21, 2012, 07:48:PM »
It's on the other forum. I said I would ask NGB if I was allowed to post about my falling out with people here - and post some PM's.

Thanks, have you got a link please?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2012, 07:49:PM »


Edit out the link if I'm not meant to post links in the topic.

thanks i have now removed the link.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #22 on: June 21, 2012, 08:21:PM »
I can inform you all who have kindly asked after Jackie, that Jackie will not be returning to the forum in the foreseeable future.  Jackie's ban has not been lifted and is likely to remain in place.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2012, 08:22:PM by Roch »

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #23 on: June 21, 2012, 08:22:PM »
I can inform you all who have kindly asked after Jackie, that Jackie will not be returning to the forum in the for seeable future.  Jackie's ban has not been lifted and is likely to remain in place.


Are we allowed to ask why, Roch? Or can you at least confirm she wasn't banned for arguing with me the night I was banned?

Understand if you can't though.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2012, 08:24:PM »

Are we allowed to ask why, Roch? Or can you at least confirm she wasn't banned for arguing with me the night I was banned?

Understand if you can't though.

I can confirm that the ban does not relate to the incident you are referring to. 

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #25 on: June 21, 2012, 08:25:PM »
I can confirm that the ban does not relate to the incident you are referring to.

Okay, thanks.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Jackie
« Reply #26 on: June 21, 2012, 08:33:PM »
I can inform you all who have kindly asked after Jackie, that Jackie will not be returning to the forum in the foreseeable future.  Jackie's ban has not been lifted and is likely to remain in place.
Jackie has just replied to me in a personal off forum email explaining what you have just said, i will tell all members you are on this rock in space for only a tiny time i promise you without jackie ,jeremy will never see the outside , a sad piece of news.Life is too short to go this far.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2012, 08:36:PM by mertol22 »

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Jackie
« Reply #27 on: June 21, 2012, 08:38:PM »
I can inform you all who have kindly asked after Jackie, that Jackie will not be returning to the forum in the foreseeable future.  Jackie's ban has not been lifted and is likely to remain in place.

That is a real shame Roch. How sad!  :(

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #28 on: June 21, 2012, 08:39:PM »
Jackie has just replied to me in a personal off forum email explaining what you have just said, i will tell all members you are on this rock in space for only a tiny time i promise you without jackie ,jeremy will never see the outside , a sad piece of news.Life is too short to go this far, i went crazy on the phone this morning over my hassle ending a phone contract even i wish i had not now.

Mertol you have always been supportive of Jackie.  Although I've had tussles with her my self, I have always liked Jackie.  I'm 100% certain I can speak for the other mods and say the same.  However there were no alternative options which could resolve the situation that had arose.   I understand that this will be disappointing for some members.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Jackie
« Reply #29 on: June 21, 2012, 08:41:PM »
That is a real shame Roch. How sad!  :(

Yes, it is sad.  However there were no adequate alternatives in light of events.