youre welcome tricksy 
i agree the case is very complex, and i get confused with all the things that are written especially relating to the bullets and silencer issues. Theres a hell of alot of information to get your head round.
do you think the case should be referred?
Andrea,

I am disappointed with the CCRC decision to not to allow an appeal.
I feel that there was enough there to warrant a new trial.
I am unhappy with Essex Police handling of the case. That their records say someone was communicating with them in the house and that they took two phone calls according to their log. One from Jeremy and his father.
I am particularly unhappy with evidence being disposed of eg. The Bible. Why? Why on earth in this day and age when appeals take place would such an item be disposed of?
Why will they not hand over the negatives? What about the Public Immunity Documents. If all was above board in the investigation, then why are they so afraid to hand over these documents?
I am unhappy with the silencer being used as evidence, as it sat there for 34 days then was handed in by someone who stood to profit from the families death if Jeremy was out of the way. Who knows what happened to that silencer in 34 days? How on earth do we know the train of evidence wasn't corrupted?
Why was a whole bullet shown and linked to one gun when only fragments existed?
How credible was Julie Mugford to give evidence?
To me, all of these questions need answering. That is not even going down the photograph route!
Some things (and that is from the little I know about this case) do not add up.