0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
That's certain, is it?
She couldn't tell the truth if she wasn't told the truth!!
or as Adam himself said - it just had a ring of truth.
Jeremy didn't tell Julie the truth - not the whole story, so she could only tell what she knew, if that wasn't the truth, then that's down to Jeremy.
Or - what the police wanted her to say and fed to her in the "noble cause"Thats my opinion and I am sticking to it.
That's it, the police told Julie what to say. This was around the same time they told the lab technicians to contaminate the silencer and get the experts to give false evidence on Sheila's condition. Poor Jeremy didn't know what had hit him after returning from St Tropez.
Why would they bother to invent a hit man? Why wouldn't they just get her to say that Jeremy told her he killed them?
because I think at one stage they thought he had an accomplice who had made the call from the house. I am not sure why . But I think they were under pressure for answers and at that point they had little evidence .
Making up a hitman is absurd. Fingering someone as that made up hitman is even more absurd. If you are going to make one up you say Jeremy never revealed the name. You don't ID someone so that such person can provide an alibi and demolish the entire lie in short order.