The tide had turned on him before that, Jan. He had already been banned by that point I think & he wasn't popular before his ban.
Which point are you agreeing with, Susan?
The first.
"No he threw wild allegations accusations about criminal acts against him implicating people without proof.
I think that is more the reason. "
Or the Second
"the judgement for him changing his mind should be reserved until we see the reason why. "
I agree with the second, shame that supporters didn't think of that at the time. It was suggested on here he had changed his mind because it would make a better book - and that had probably had never held supporter feelings and had been disguising himself as a supporter when he'd been a guilter all along 
I think we are all aware that you have to do something really really bad to be banned from here
Threatening people is one of them.
I have changed my mind in that I am willing to read the book - I just hope at then end of it his surmising is not based on a hunch or gut feeling or something obscure . Because if it is something concrete he could obviously use it to stop any future attempts at appeals.
Who has persuaded you to read it I wonder?
??
