Author Topic: Police arrival at WHF what next ?  (Read 13426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #90 on: May 22, 2012, 10:23:AM »
Very well put Grahame.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #91 on: May 22, 2012, 10:24:AM »
Thank you Patti

It's a case with Robert Boutflour of selective memory and as for Robert Boutflour being a good honest man I don't believe that's the impression most of the impartial members of this forum think

Vidvic you made a statement a weeks ago that Jeremy killed his family not think he killed his family you know he killed his family

You keep asking Mike to post the missing photo

Please post the PROOF that you KNOW Jeremy killed his family and the whole forum can wait with baited
breath

Is this selective memory as in 'seeing movement' in the house. Or the timings of the call from his dad, or whether he called Julie before or after he called the police? That kind of selective memory?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #92 on: May 22, 2012, 10:25:AM »
Certainly jackie. Once you post the evidence which shows he didn't. No probs.

Vic trying going back over every post that I have ever made because I have constantly made it clear nobody knows who committed the murders I form my own opinion on facts and statements, it is an opinion a very strong opinion

You have stated you KNOW Jeremy is responsible for the murders

Now post the proof here for EVERYONE to see
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #93 on: May 22, 2012, 10:32:AM »
Selective memory as in Robert Boutflour misleading the Jury that the family wouldn't benefit from Jeremys conviction

Why couldn't they just be honest
Why couldn't JM just be honest

The poor jury member have had to live for 26 years knowing they most probably convicted the wrong man because of being misled by members of the family and Mugford

Jeremy never hated farming and the family behaved disgracefully
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #94 on: May 22, 2012, 10:46:AM »
Vic trying going back over every post that I have ever made because I have constantly made it clear nobody knows who committed the murders I form my own opinion on facts and statements, it is an opinion a very strong opinion

You have stated you KNOW Jeremy is responsible for the murders

Now post the proof here for EVERYONE to see

Where did I say this?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

NewChilledOutHartley

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #95 on: May 22, 2012, 10:50:AM »
Vic trying going back over every post that I have ever made because I have constantly made it clear nobody knows who committed the murders I form my own opinion on facts and statements, it is an opinion a very strong opinion

You have stated you KNOW Jeremy is responsible for the murders

Now post the proof here for EVERYONE to see

Yes, but he's also advertising a ROCH index of 99.9. Wow, how's that for controversial?

Clearly he's rounding up in his previous post.  ::)
« Last Edit: May 22, 2012, 10:50:AM by -Hartley- »

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #96 on: May 22, 2012, 11:11:AM »
Where did I say this?
ftp://

I will find it and if it's one of your posts that's been deleted Keira will have it because she said your post was outrageous
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #97 on: May 22, 2012, 11:41:AM »
If the police were not in conversation with a female occupant who were they in conversation with ? unless it was not sheila.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #98 on: May 22, 2012, 12:26:PM »
Well,Mertol,they were alleged to have been in conversation with someone,and it certainly wasn't JB,,unless he can throw his voice as well as having allegedly murdered five people while he,himself was in bed at his own home.Who knows.?

bloggs and son

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #99 on: May 22, 2012, 12:43:PM »
Well,Mertol,they were alleged to have been in conversation with someone,and it certainly wasn't JB,,unless he can throw his voice as well as having allegedly murdered five people while he,himself was in bed at his own home.Who knows.?
I'm still looking for the documentation which actually says that. Anyone know where it is please?

NewChilledOutHartley

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #100 on: May 22, 2012, 12:45:PM »
I'm still looking for the documentation which actually says that. Anyone know where it is please?
Check the logs, but be sure to also see the sentence which immediately follows.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=732.0;attach=16098;image
« Last Edit: May 22, 2012, 12:49:PM by -Hartley- »

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17591
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #101 on: May 22, 2012, 12:50:PM »
Check the logs, but be sure to see the sentence which immediately follows.

Doesn't it imply the a loudhailer was used for approx five minutes?  In the entire time that police were outside the property, preparing to storm the building, using hand signals for stealth, a loudhailer was only used for a total of approx five minutes?  And it just so happens that the first entry relates to a 'conversation'?

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #102 on: May 22, 2012, 12:51:PM »
Well,Mertol,they were alleged to have been in conversation with someone,and it certainly wasn't JB,,unless he can throw his voice as well as having allegedly murdered five people while he,himself was in bed at his own home.Who knows.?
Lookout JB has nothing to do with this part but your post does show a few things who knows ?  someone must, to establish or have established contact are two different things but the logs posted on the forum say different, i would like to see those logs under lock and key they may offer an alternative version of events that night.

NewChilledOutHartley

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #103 on: May 22, 2012, 12:52:PM »
Doesn't it imply the a loudhailer was used for approx five minutes?  In the entire time that police were outside the property, preparing to storm the building, using hand signals for stealth, a loudhailer was only used for a total of approx five minutes?  And it just so happens that the first entry relates to a 'conversation'?

Thought it was two hours, but I haven't looked at this for a while, so may be mistaken, I'll take a look.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Police arrival at WHF what next ?
« Reply #104 on: May 22, 2012, 12:59:PM »
The Location of the incident was isolated well off a public road there were no direct high risk of safety to the general public, whoever was inside could not posssibly make a break for it, there were other alternatives to resolve this situation and they were not taken a very poor police operation .