Author Topic: Andrea  (Read 8186 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Andrea
« Reply #60 on: March 16, 2012, 11:38:AM »
Just been reading the comments on here, Grahame i still dont think Jackie should have sent personal info about me to other people.

As for for people being suspicious of me on this forum, well, people dont like the fact that i went from leaning to innocence to guilty, but i expected that.

So, i will go the way of Bob me thinks.

Before i go i want to say thankyou to the people have been brilliant to me, they know who they are.

Bye bye xx

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Andrea
« Reply #61 on: March 16, 2012, 12:22:PM »
grahame, it comes down to the 'starve them of oxygen' approach. 

Support would / could be given to forum members, in the proposed private section.  Since all established members of the forum would have access to that section, anyone who genuinely needed to know about such abuse, would indeed find out about it.

Think about it.  Counter actions would be discussed in private, instead of vague or knee-jerk threats being issued on the open forum.

The overriding advantage is that none of this would interfere with the open forum.  Interference with the open forum is the very aim of those seeking to attack the members you /or I wish to support.

Roch, very sensible post!  ;)
Bob and Andy, sorry to see you go. Thanks for all your good input.

Janet

  • Guest
Re: Andrea
« Reply #62 on: March 16, 2012, 02:33:PM »
I apologise Janet.

Thank you Grahame. I understand you are upset and angry. I would be too. 
What is happening is cruel and horrible.  Rochford said what I was trying to say. :)